Dog Brothers Public Forum
Return To Homepage
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 28, 2014, 01:44:30 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
81306 Posts in 2243 Topics by 1046 Members
Latest Member: MikeT
* Home Help Search Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 43
151  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / biker gang protection, seriously on: December 02, 2013, 04:22:53 PM

I love this. Verily.
152  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Russia and Japan Make a Play for the Pacific on: December 02, 2013, 12:28:04 PM

From the article:

New ties between Russia and Japan would mark not only a breakthrough in their relations but also a significant shift in Northeast Asia’s political dynamic. Since the 1950s, U.S. alliances with Japan and South Korea have dominated regional security. Russia and China thawed their frosty relationship in the 1990s and signed a friendship treaty in 2001, but China’s rise has increased tensions in every regional relationship.
153  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / ‘Bizarre behavior’ could be risk to Christie White House run on: December 02, 2013, 12:21:50 PM

From the article:

Gov. Chris Christie’s “bizarre behavior’’ in refusing to say he’ll support a possible GOP challenger to Gov. Cuomo next year could derail his chances to become president, state and national GOP insiders have told The Post.
154  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / “Fear and War in Cyberspace” on: December 02, 2013, 06:43:37 AM

From the article:

Should we fear cyberspace?  The internet is said to be a revolutionary leveler, reducing the hard won military advantages of western powers, even as the dependence of developed nations on computer networks leaves them vulnerable to attack.  Incidents like the Stuxnet worm and cyber attacks against U.S. government computers, apparently launched from servers in China, seem to testify to the need for concern.  Yet, even if these details are correct—and some are not—there is no reason to believe that the internet constitutes an Achilles heel for the existing world order.  To the contrary, cyberwar promises major advantages for status quo powers like the United States.
155  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / What’s Happening in the East China Sea? on: November 30, 2013, 04:34:36 PM

From the article:

Last weekend, the Chinese astonished the U.S. and Japan, very close allies with similar views about Senkaku sovereignty, by declaring that all planes flying in this zone must get China’s permission. They must submit flight plans to Beijing. “If an aircraft doesn’t supply its flight plans,” the Chinese Ministry of National Defense announced, “China’s armed forces will adopt emergency defensive measures in response.”

Wait a minute!, was the immediate reaction in Tokyo and Washington. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel denounced the Chinese announcement as a “destabilizing attempt to alter the status quo in the region,”…increasing “the risk of misunderstanding and miscalculations.” Japan’s Foreign Minister Fumio Kishida echoed Hagel’s statement, describing the Chinese action as “one-sided” with the potential to “trigger unpredictable events” and “cannot be allowed.”
156  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Is This Where We Part Company? on: November 30, 2013, 03:51:01 PM

From the article:

...since the U.S. invasion of 2003, Kurdistan, a semi-autonomous region of Iraq, has become an oasis in an otherwise anarchic and dangerous country. The veteran journalist describes celebrations marking the Kurdish New Year in Sulaimaniya: “Never before had I, a Westerner, been able to walk safely through a vast throng of Iraqis, or experienced such tolerance, friendliness, and absence of fear or religious stricture. Women with uncovered heads wore makeup and golden jewelry. Teenagers discreetly flirted. A few obviously gay men, and the odd drunk, wandered uncensored through the crowds.”

With life so good for so many Kurds today, and so bad in the rest of Iraq, might Kurdistan secede?
157  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Drones, warfare, science fiction and cybercrime on: November 30, 2013, 04:25:36 AM

From the interview:

The interplay between science fiction and the real world is a force that has been there for centuries. At one point, it was through writers like H.G. Wells, because the novel was the main vector for entertainment. Then we moved on to movies and TV shows — think of how powerful Star Trek was in influencing where technology would head next. Now it’s gaming. It’s like what happened in those great old episodes of Star Trek, where they envisioned something futuristic like a handheld communicator and then someone watching in a lab would see it and said, “I’ll make that real.” And now that’s the same for gaming. I was a consultant for the video game Call of Duty: Black Ops II, and I worked on a drone concept for the game, a quadcopter called Charlene. Now defense contractors are trying to make Charlene real. So it flips the relationship. Previously, the military would research and develop something and then spin it out to the civilian sector. Now the military is faced with a challenge of how to spin in technology.
158  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Hypotheses on Why China Declared Air Defense Zone on: November 29, 2013, 06:01:09 AM
GM: This is China/Japan/US issues, but this is the type of thing I mention in the Iran thread. Numbers 2 and 4, at least, have a rational choice element that could be researched more.
159  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Iran on: November 28, 2013, 05:26:59 AM
I am not aware of an in depth, academic work using rational choice about the negotiations that ended a few days ago. There are, however, several rational choice models about Iranian (foreign) policy more generally.

Here are some examples:

If you want more current thought, I suggest academic blog sites like the Duck of Minerva or The Monkey Cage. Foreign Policy's online resources might something too.
160  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Big History on: November 27, 2013, 07:37:47 PM
This looks like a pretty cool show:
161  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Iran on: November 27, 2013, 07:31:57 PM
Is this a real question, or a continued snide line of "discussion"?
162  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Iran on: November 27, 2013, 05:28:02 PM
While this is a criticism, IMO the better rational choice theorists are able to account for history and culture. I have found that those who criticize in this way fail to understand it.

This is explained in both articles I posted.

a) FWIW I think BD is using "rational" is a specific "term of art" academic sense and GM is using it as it is used in everyday conversation.

"Because rational choice theory lacks understanding of consumer motivation, some economists restrict its use to understanding business behavior where goals are usually very clear. As Armen Alchian points out, competition in the market encourages businesses to maximize profits (in order to survive). Because that goal is significantly less vacuous than "maximizing utility" and the like, rational choice theory is apt."

Trying to analyze geopolitics without factoring in culture, history, belief systems seems pretty useless.
163  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Iran on: November 27, 2013, 05:03:25 AM
This is explained in both articles I posted.

a) FWIW I think BD is using "rational" is a specific "term of art" academic sense and GM is using it as it is used in everyday conversation.

164  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / Next time you think, ‘I don’t like cops’ on: November 27, 2013, 05:01:47 AM

From the article:

You know, I think I have said the same thing only because one or two cops, in my entire life, have caused me grief whether it was a ticket, ( I obviously did not deserve ), or some smart ass reply directed my way when I interfered with their presumably mundane day.  Shame on me for being so presumptuous.

Pretty petty now as I see it.  Pretty petty of me.

165  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Iran on: November 25, 2013, 09:27:24 PM
So you don't like the definition??? All your posts don't change the definition.

The "rationality" described by rational choice theory is different from the colloquial and most philosophical use of the word. Typically, "rationality" means "sane" or "in a thoughtful clear-headed manner,." Rational choice theory uses a specific and narrower definition of "rationality" simply to mean that an individual acts as if balancing costs against benefits to arrive at action that maximizes personal advantage.[5] In rational choice theory, all decisions, crazy or sane, are postulated as mimicking such a "rational" process.
166  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Iran on: November 25, 2013, 05:19:51 PM
That is a matter of definition. In the case of the article, "rational" means "preference maximizing."

People who have sent their children marching into minefields en mass aren't rational actors.
167  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / History of the Russian Nuclear Weapons Program on: November 25, 2013, 11:51:40 AM

168  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: The US Congress; Congressional races on: November 25, 2013, 07:53:03 AM
I understood where you are coming from. I am surprised sometimes when we agree on an issue or point.
169  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Re: Issues in the American Creed (Constitutional Law and related matters) on: November 25, 2013, 05:22:08 AM
How would you assess this case BD?

Had the talk with the lawyer friend. His assessment is that because the GA officer was personally named the case is "crap." Had the two kept to named the DEA, for example, then the case has merit. He also noted his great interest in the amici filed (seen here:, in particular the one offered by the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association.

170  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Bargaining theory and the Iran deal on: November 25, 2013, 05:14:53 AM

From the article:

War is costly to all sides in a conflict. If states knew the outcome of a war, they would prefer to agree to that outcome via a bargain without ever fighting. As the Monkey Cage’s (and Stanford’s)  James Fearon has pointed out in a famous article, we must thus ask why states sometimes fail to reach such a bargain?

One answer is that leaders act irrationally or that the leaders of states are able to deflect the cost of wars on others while reaping the benefits for themselves. These are plausible answers. Yet, it may also be that all sides act rationally and yet fail to strike a bargain that all would prefer to going to war.  Below are some basic insights from theories about such bargaining failures as they apply to Iran.
171  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: The US Congress; Congressional races on: November 25, 2013, 05:12:58 AM

I think I just saw flying pigs!  cheesy
172  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / first term on: November 25, 2013, 05:09:38 AM

Despite all the lamentations about Barack Obama having second-term blues and bad luck, and the talk about how a painful second term is not atypical, it’s what happened during the first term that matters most. With the exception of possible exogenous events, a president’s first term defines his second one. The enormous difficulties that Obama is having with his signature issue, the health care law, are the shining example of how that can work. Almost everything that has gone wrong with the program was set in motion in the early years of his presidency.

The first term is when the president makes fateful decisions about what kind of people he wants in his White House, how he wants them organized, the nature and role of his cabinet members (are they essentially staff, as most tend to be in the Obama administration?), which initiatives he selects as his most important, whether he builds a strong cadre of outside allies, how he deals with the Congress and how hard he is willing to fight for what he wants.

Not unlike some other presidents, Obama essentially surrounded himself in the White House with his campaign staff, or others he knew well, rather than finding people experienced in governing. Newly elected presidents pay a heavy price if they are themselves inexperienced in governing and select top staff who lack a broad sense of what it means to run a federal government.

The shock of adjusting to the presidency—the myriad amounts of information and decisions to be made thrown at them—hits most newcomers. Where to begin? Which decisions to tell your staff are presidential-level ones and which ones are they to work out on their own? How much authority to give to the cabinet—a set of relationships that is almost always fraught. Only if a newly elected president has served as vice president or in a tiny number of other high offices can he have been given a prior sense of the vast chasm between running for president and being president. There is a lot of talk these days that former governors are the only ones who are truly prepared to occupy the oval office. But that’s hogwash. To my knowledge none have a Pentagon to run, or a raft of foreign policy decisions coming at them every day, or fifty sub-states and a potentially obdurate Congress to deal with. There is no training for the presidency.

Barack Obama had an unfathomable inability, beginning in his early years in office, to grasp the difference between campaigning and governing—and for that he’s been paying a fearful price in his second term. Campaigning and governing call for different kinds of rhetoric. For some reason, Obama never got control of the health care argument. He cited its attractive provisions many times, but he just didn’t get through.

As for his promise that if people liked their health insurance policy they could keep it, former aides say that they were uneasily aware that it was misleading, or oversimplified. But they figured that it represented a small slice of the probably large group who would eagerly sign up for the new plan. They also figured that if the federal website was working the way it should, most people would be aware they had access to better options. They didn’t come clean that some people were going to lose out under the new plan. The president, now on the defensive, and almost groveling, remained unable to get across the enormous benefits of providing some 30 million uninsured people with coverage.

Fateful decisions made in the first term reflected Obama’s lack of understanding of what it meant to govern. Early on, I received a startling insight into how the Obama White House approached working with Congress. I asked a senior presidential aide why the White House hadn’t sent up its own health care legislation, so that there would be something coherent to start with and more leverage. His reply: “Because any time we lost a provision that would be seen as a loss.” This was a most unusual way to deal with Congress—tying one’s own hands at the outset.

As the health care legislation moved through Congress, Obama and his top aides became swallowed up in the details. Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s first chief of staff, had much to recommend him: he’d served in the Clinton White House and been a member of Congress. But he was an inside man, buried in the maw of the legislation—and apparently unable to see the big picture. Moreover, it’s virtually impossible for Congress to write a coherent complex piece of legislation. In this case, particularly large interests are at play: the insurance companies (who would still play the major role as insurers), manufacturers of medical equipment, hospitals, drug companies, religious organizations—and without its own bill the administration had limited leverage over numerous strong-minded legislators. Five hundred and thirty five people are unlikely to produce a fine Swiss watch.

But Obama and his staff’s failures at governing led to the disastrous roll-out of the exchanges. Simply put: they went about it all wrong. Such a major part of the president’s signature initiative should never have been assigned to the multilayered bureaucracy, however honorable and well-intended its people are. Obama needed to put in charge a single strong figure who could go straight to him and was known to have his backing—and, obviously, knew enough about the complexities of such a large high tech program. The president needed to be kept very informed as to where matters stood. (The White House put about after the calamity became clear to the public that the president had occasionally asked how things were going; this wasn’t reassuring.) Short of appointing a strong outside person, the president could have relied on a figure such as Joe Califano, Lyndon Johnson’s chief domestic policy adviser, to be on top of the implementation and raise hell if the people charged with building the exchanges weren’t doing the job.

It remains unclear to this day who in the Obama White House was responsible for seeing to it that the program was on schedule and working as it should—or if anyone was. There’s no sign that the president’s serial chiefs of staff—after Emanuel, who left in October, 2010, and then Bill Daley, Jack Lew, and now Dennis McDonough—were engaged in any meaningful way.

Another misfire was the brobdingnagian nature of the Obama plan, like that of the Clintons’ plan before it: wonks were in charge and there seems to have been little checking to see if real people could handle it. While the Affordable Care Act was moving through Congress, White House aides explained that it would all be very simple: the consumer would go online and pick out a health plan from among choices—just as, they said, people do with Expedia. Quite apart from the federal web site’s own flaws, the Obama plan suffered from an overestimation of computer literacy among the public at large.

Finally, the president’s offhanded way of dealing with Congress in the first term has weakened his hand with members of his own party in the second term, at precisely the point when he needs them most. The very self-contained Obama, less needy than many of his predecessors, and his impatience with some of the folderol of politics—albeit it’s his chosen line of work—left him with few senators or House members, or even outside groups, who would go to the barricades for him when he needed them in the second term. One can understand and even sympathize with Obama’s view of listening to tedious people who lecture him on how things should be done (they might actually know more than he, but he doesn’t care to be told), but it’s been very costly for him.

The health care law is a delicate instrument, built on sets of assumptions which may not pan out, or which could be undermined if out of panic the president or Congress fiddles with the law. The anecdotes about people losing their policies have frequently been over-simplified, but make for more dramatic news stories than the advances already achieved under the law; there’s been little attention to the already slowing rate of growth in the cost of health care—one of the law’s major goals.

Obama’s governing style in his first term lit the fuse for his second term. Politically-driven decisions on the health care law along with a failure to understand some of the rudiments of governing have resulted in his current difficulties. It’s far from over of course, but should his proudest achievement fail to work—its outcome not at all certain at this point—the rest of what he does in his second term may not matter much.
173  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: The US Congress; Congressional races on: November 23, 2013, 04:04:34 PM
A) You are quite welcome. You made a good point, and I saw an article that supported it.

B) Yep. 2 things: 1, I've been arguing for a while here and elsewhere that if/when the Dems used the Nuke option they would eventually rue the day. I still feel this way. We'll see in a year or so if the GOP reverts to the old filibuster rule. It will be their option, I think... and I doubt they do.
174  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: The US Congress; Congressional races on: November 23, 2013, 12:18:14 PM
Another strand here is that the DC circuit court overseas most regulatory matters.  Currently it is 4-4 with three vacant seats.  With Baraq getting to appoint 3 judges that becomes a 7-4 virtual sure thing for expansion of bureaucratic liberal fascism.

Of course I get that we should not play situational ethics, I but note the situational ethics of the Dems in this play.

On your first point:

On your second, let's recall that the GOP wanted the rules change in '05. Both parties are guilty of "situational ethics."
175  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Re: Issues in the American Creed (Constitutional Law and related matters) on: November 23, 2013, 07:30:49 AM
As the officer in question was doing the work of the DEA, it seems to me that the original 9th circuit panel got it right. That said, I am going to ask a friend who has a practice in this (approximate) area who I hope to have a discussion with.

GM, do you have any thoughts on this?
176  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Sebelius is the Big Loser in Today's Filibuster Game-Changer on: November 23, 2013, 02:22:40 AM

From the article:

Problems exist in HHS. No one denies it. However, for many appointees in the Department, the Senate rules served as a life preserver in a torrent of poor implementation, managerial failures, and bad PR. So long as the president faced the prospect of long-term vacancies among appointees overseeing ACA, the HHS leadership would be spared.

Today, that all changed. Moving forward, President Obama needs the support of only 51 Senate Democrats to replace top-level political appointees throughout the executive branch. This offers the president substantial breathing room. Nominees no longer need the support of every Democrat and a scarcely identifiable five Republicans. Instead, nominees can draw the ire of as many as four Democrats and still be confirmed
177  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Chess ammo on: November 22, 2013, 07:30:59 AM   cool cool
178  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / egad on: November 22, 2013, 07:09:10 AM
Man... you guys are going to "love" this:

From the article:

But personal jurisdiction is exactly what the Supreme Court will consider on Monday, when it hears oral arguments in Walden v. Fiore. At issue in the case is whether Fiore and Gipson can sue a Georgia police officer working as a Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent in federal district court in Nevada for seizing their funds without probable cause and holding the money for more than six months before it was returned to them.
179  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / A New Model for Defense Intelligence on: November 22, 2013, 04:57:47 AM
180  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / The Myth of Easy War on: November 22, 2013, 04:09:19 AM

From the article:

In the acolytes' telling, overcoming anti-access can only be accomplished by the technical services -- that, is the Air Force and the Navy -- fighting through sophisticated defenses, which requires massive investments. They then assume away any chance of ground operations. Precision strikes and distant blockades will spare us the mess of combat. The conclusion is to slash the Army, freeing up money for Big Navy and Air Force. Risk is minimal since the Army is easily expandable.

The story is tight and marketable and has just one shortfall: It does not work. Shock and Awe substitutes problems that can be solved by a target list for the thorny questions that U.S. global security interests naturally pose. It appeals to our natural desire for a quick-fix solution that keeps us arm's length from strategic entanglement. It makes us feel good, even if it is totally inadequate and unaffordable in the long run.
181  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / the (near) death of the filibuster on: November 21, 2013, 01:12:36 PM
182  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / bus driver is 'selfless heroine' on: November 21, 2013, 09:44:03 AM
183  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / Re: Dog Howie: Rest in Peace----RIP on: November 21, 2013, 09:40:00 AM
I was thinking of Howie this morning. As Thanksgiving approaches, I want to thank him for being part of my journey. I hope you are resting well, warrior.
184  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Ginsburg interview on: November 18, 2013, 07:20:38 PM

From last year.
185  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Thomas interviews on: November 18, 2013, 07:20:00 PM

From last week.
186  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Three’s a crowd on: November 18, 2013, 06:51:41 AM

From the article:

... the Clintons have their own agenda and it is not identical to Obama’s.
187  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / Re: Citizen-Police interactions on: November 18, 2013, 05:06:35 AM
May I ask how old this article is? I find it surprising in light of,0,686331.story. That said, there may be follow up issues in Illinois I am not aware of.
188  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / Sour Stench of Promoter Greed on: November 17, 2013, 07:20:16 PM

From the article:

At the end of his title fight with Johny Hendricks, Georges St-Pierre was not right in the head. Already looking like he'd repeatedly run his face into a wall, St-Pierre showed an even scarier sign of the damage he had sustained. In his corner, preparing to step back into the fray against the hardest puncher in his division, GSP asked a telling question:

"What round is it?"
189  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / Re: Rest in Peace RIP R.I.P. on: November 16, 2013, 02:28:38 PM
My condolences, Guro.
190  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / on Krauthammer on: November 16, 2013, 08:33:51 AM
As I've said before, I sincerely enjoy reading Krauthammer.
191  DBMA Martial Arts Forum / Martial Arts Topics / Bartitsu on: November 15, 2013, 06:42:27 AM

192  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Goldsmith on nat'l. security law and press on: November 15, 2013, 06:19:39 AM
193  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / partisan divide in the Senate on: November 14, 2013, 05:47:04 PM
194  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / partisan divide in the Senate on: November 14, 2013, 02:02:49 PM
195  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / from an email... on: November 14, 2013, 01:37:23 PM
Affordable Boat Act

The U.S. government has just passed a new law called: "The affordable boat
act" declaring that every citizen MUST purchase a new boat, by April 2014.
These "affordable" boats will cost an average of $54,000-$155,000 each.
This does not include taxes, trailers, towing fees, licensing and registration
fees, fuel, docking and storage fees, maintenance or repair costs.

This law has been passed, because until now, typically only wealthy and
financially responsible people have been able to purchase boats. This new
laws ensures that every American can now have a "affordable" boat of their
own, because everyone is "entitled" to a new boat. If you purchase your
boat before the end of the year, you will receive 4 "free" life jackets; not
including monthly usage fees.

In order to make sure everyone purchases an affordable boat, the costs of
owning a boat will increase on average of 250-400% per year. This way,
wealthy people will pay more for something that other people do not want or
can not afford to maintain. But to be fair, people who can not afford to maintain
their boat will be regularly fined and children (under the age of 26) can
use their parents boats to party on until they turn 27; then must purchase
their own boat.

If you already have a boat, you can keep yours (just kidding; no you
can not). If you do not want or do not need a boat, you are required to buy one
anyhow. If you refuse to buy one or can not afford one, you will be regularly fined
$800 until you purchase one or face imprisonment.

Failure to use the boat will also result in fines. People living in the
desert; ghettos; inner cities or areas with no access to lakes are not
exempt. Age, motion sickness, experience, knowledge nor lack of desire are
acceptable excuses for not using your boat.

A government review board (that does not know the difference between the
port, starboard or stern of a boat) will decide everything, including; when,
where, how often and for what purposes you can use your boat along with
how many people can ride your boat and determine if one is too old or healthy
enough to be able to use their boat. They will also decide if your boat
has out lived its usefulness or if you must purchase specific accessories, (like
a $500 compass) or a newer and more expensive boat.

Those that can afford yachts will be required to do is only fair.
The government will also decide the name for each boat. Failure to comply with
these rules will result in fines and possible imprisonment.

Government officials are exempt from this new law. If they want a boat,
they and their families can obtain boats free, at the expense of tax payers.
Unions, bankers and mega companies with large political affiliations ($$$)
are also exempt.

If the government can force you to buy health care, they can force you to buy a boat....or ANYTHING else.. is that stupid...
196  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Jeh Johnson hearing on: November 14, 2013, 10:32:38 AM
197  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Science, Culture, & Humanities / Re: Origination Clause to Obamacare on: November 13, 2013, 06:48:22 AM
I think it was Doug. It appears to be in a different circuit (DC this time; 2nd (I think) in the first case).

I thought someone (BD?) posted to the effect that this cause of action had been accounted for, but from the looks of this , , , maybe not:
198  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Cyber-Pearl Harbor is a myth on: November 11, 2013, 04:53:22 PM

From the article:

Of course, cyberattacks can still be used for specific and limited goals. For example, the so-called Stuxnet/Olympic Games attack on the Iranian nuclear program was apparently mounted jointly by the United States and Israel. However, here too, military force is important. Gartzke argues that one of the reasons that the U.S. and Israel could carry out this attack is because they are militarily powerful in conventional terms, making it unattractive for Iran (or other adversaries) to attack them back directly.

More generally, Gartkze’s arguments imply that cyberwar isn’t a weapon of the weak. Instead, it’s a weapon of the strong — it will be most attractive to those who already have powerful conventional militaries
199  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Why so many Americans believe Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories on: November 11, 2013, 04:48:52 PM

From the article:

Conspiracy theories are conquering the country, leading us into a dark age of cynicism.  Americans are bombarded by a growing barrage of outlandish tales, aided and abetted by a polarizing media, and amplified by the echo chamber of the Internet.  While all sides indulge in conspiracy theories, Republicans and conservatives are particularly prone to them.  Such inflamed rhetoric divides nations and destroys deliberative democracy.
200  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities / Politics & Religion / Re: Politics at the State & Municipal level on: November 07, 2013, 04:20:41 PM
"I'm not advocating limits, just exercising my own free speech to call them out on their chicanery.  ('the use of trickery to achieve a political, financial, or legal purpose')  smiley"

I just laughed out loud. Literally. Well played, Doug.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 43
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!