Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 17, 2017, 04:51:52 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
105312 Posts in 2392 Topics by 1093 Members
Latest Member: Cruces
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

 1 
 on: October 16, 2017, 11:34:42 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by Crafty_Dog
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/16/bill-clinton-caught-harvey-weinstein-sexual-assaul/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkdKak0yRTRPRE15TkRGaSIsInQiOiIxSlVjQWxwcXJ4Nm8zcklVWENSSEhidHE0dTNkMWpCTDM5NDQxamJKamI0dENEeG15MnlOdkVGaTRKMWZERjNmUm9XMkVwUkVBTGhjZ3IwXC9kcUlVQko4alN4K1NJNjYrbEg4YmQ4Mm5RK1RFQTR3ek1PWUxmWHN5NUVuK1pjOHAifQ%3D%3D

 2 
 on: October 16, 2017, 07:55:28 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
more "deep state" coverups ?


http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/10/16/loretta-lynch-documents-deep-state-doesnt-want-release-damaging-records-tom-fitton

 3 
 on: October 16, 2017, 06:36:31 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
Crafty D :

"  JW: WTF? Tillerson State Dept. and Sessions DOJ protecting Hillary?!? "


That is precisely why I was hoping that JJ would ask Chafitz the question *why*

Smells  like a rotten egg in Denmark to me.  (though I have never been to Denmark)

 4 
 on: October 16, 2017, 06:33:58 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
GM:

" **Remember, Hollywood/DNC/the left isn't dropping Weinstein because they found out what he has done. They've known for years, decades even. They are dropping him because WE found out about him."

That is the truth in a nutshell

Plain and simple.


 5 
 on: October 16, 2017, 05:44:37 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by G M
**Remember, Hollywood/DNC/the left isn't dropping Weinstein because they found out what he has done. They've known for years, decades even. They are dropping him because WE found out about him.

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/372026.php

October 16, 2017
Harvey Weinstein Helped Pay Bill Clinton's Legal Bills During Lewinsky Investigations
Thick as sexual assailants.

Harvey Weinstein is no stranger to sex scandals -- back when Bill Clinton was battling allegations he lied about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky, Weinstein had the presidentís back, and a hefty check in hand.
A recently uncovered 1998 story in The Washington Post lists the powerful producer -- now accused of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women -- among several Hollywood heavyweights who gave the maximum $10,000 to Clintonís legal defense fund.

The detail gives a fuller picture of the longstanding financial relationship between the former first family and one of their best West Coast fundraisers. That relationship has been under the microscope after Hillary Clinton came under criticism for waiting five days to condemn Weinstein.

How many dominoes will fall before we're done? Is anyone, for example, going to probe deeper into Jeffrey Epstein and the Lolita Express to Pedophile Isle?

I don't see much media interest perking up about the allegations of widespread pedophilia in Hollywood made by Corey Feldman and Todd Bridges.

Feldman says he gave cops the names of his abusers/rapists -- before the statute of limitations ran out, so charges could have been brought -- but says police did "zero."

One begins to see a pattern of police not taking action against rich and connected Hollywood types, and one begins to wonder how deep the corruption runs.

Might be time to watch the documentary An Open Secret about Hollywood's pedophilia problem.

One of the most Hollywood-throne-sniffing magazines, Variety, claims that it's "Game Over" not just for Weinstein, but for Hollywood's Culture of the Cover-Up:

View image on Twitter
View image on Twitter
 Follow
Claudia Eller ✔@Variety_Claudia
We have an explosive story packagein tomorrow's issue. "Game Over" refers not only to Weinstein, but to Hollywood's history of covering up
11:18 AM - Oct 16, 2017
 23 23 Replies   118 118 Retweets   148 148 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy

We'll see.

 6 
 on: October 16, 2017, 05:16:53 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
if we do not use military force the NK will continue to expand their nuclear capability and threaten the whole SE Asia and more distant targets.

I conclude we should just assassinate Kim and his top henchmen, if we can .  Then be ready for any response if HIS underlings have the chuztpa to give a military response.

I wonder what the war game guys have concluded about this scenario.

Are they really against it because it won't work, or risk too high, or political fall out or all of it?

One wonders what the NK people really think of Kim and his mob.  They may be totally blacked out from the rest of the world and or just too terrified to pretend/think otherwise .

Do they know how much they suffer from the hands of the monsters who control them?  How much is brain washing and how much is sheer fear?  Don't know.

If Kin and his mob were dead would the average N Korean really fight to the death?






 7 
 on: October 16, 2017, 04:25:44 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by Crafty_Dog
Yes, of course.

So, what is our bullet point response?

 8 
 on: October 16, 2017, 04:24:32 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by Crafty_Dog
Second post

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-court-overrules-trump-administration-objections-will-review-state-department-clinton-petraeus-emails/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members&utm_content=20171016212213

 9 
 on: October 16, 2017, 04:21:49 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by Crafty_Dog
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-homeland-security-documents-reveal-sanctuary-cities-denied-284-ice-detainers-three-months-released-illegal-aliens-charged-assaults-drug-weapons-violations/?utm_source=deployer&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=tipsheet&utm_term=members&utm_content=20171016211944

 10 
 on: October 16, 2017, 03:51:05 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
" xploring it a bit further, I suspect one of the most common rejoinders, if not THE most common rejoinder, will be that once they have nuclear capability, they will no motive to initiate nuclear war and that MAD logic will take over-- and that therefore there is no need for a war of choice.  "

I assume that is the rationale of Rice/Obama  when they admit a nuclear capable NK is "not so bad"

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!