Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2017, 10:08:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
102254 Posts in 2379 Topics by 1089 Members
Latest Member: Sarge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

 1 
 on: Today at 09:53:20 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by G M
http://freebeacon.com/politics/reporters-fall-for-fake-document-showing-trump-making-insane-demands-in-israel/

But make sure to swallow all the other scoops about Trump without question.

 2 
 on: Today at 08:05:33 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by DougMacG
Quote author=ccp
This will cause riots in the streets...

Younger generation: just do it.

 3 
 on: Today at 08:01:59 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by DougMacG

I know someone who teaches there.  )

 4 
 on: Today at 07:32:41 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by G M
http://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-england-manchester-40007967

Quaker extremist? Uppity Lutherans?

 5 
 on: Today at 05:54:54 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by bigdog
http://www.businessinsider.com/winston-churchill-iron-curtain-college-speech-2017-5

 6 
 on: Today at 05:17:14 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
It really is remarkable watching the lackies on CNN going crazy trying to down play Trump and everything he says and bring the topic back to this big investigation.  You can hear the desperation in their voices and in the facial expressions .

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/05/22/cnns-zakaria-obama-could-have-given-trumps-saudi-speech/

Faaaaareeeeeed, I have news for you .  Obama did not give this speech despite having 8 yrs to do so.

OTOH McCarthy also thinks this speech had some Obama similarities :    shocked
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447857/trump-saudi-arabia-speech-islamic-terrorism-sharia

 7 
 on: Today at 04:56:38 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by ccp
This will cause riots in the streets and the airways will be going bonkers:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/22/white-house-budget-cuts-entitlements-1-7-trillion-slashes-epa-30/


 8 
 on: Today at 02:31:10 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by G M
Citations on that?  We need something specific to respond to the innuendo that is sure to come.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-arabia-u-a-e-pledge-100-million-to-world-banks-women-entrepreneurs-fund-1495339028
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Saudi Arabia, UAE pledge $100 million to Ivanka Trump-backed women's fund

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/05/22/saudi-arabia-uae-pledge-100-million-ivanka-trump-backed-womens-fund/22103654/



May 22nd 2017 11:47AM


Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have pledged a combined $100 million to the World Bank's Women Entrepreneurs Fund, a campaign that is the brainchild of Ivanka Trump.

The pledge comes during President Trump's first foreign trip, signaling the president's eldest daughter may have been instrumental in securing this significant contribution.

The World Bank announced the donation at an event on Sunday, the Wall Street Journal reports. The goal of the Ivanka-inspired fund is to help female entrepreneurs start their own businesses.


During President Trump's visit, Ivanka spoke to young Muslims saying she has seen the entrepreneurial spirit in their country.

The fund itself is new. We first heard about it from the presidential assistant during the Women 20 summit in Berlin, when Ivanka Trump called for a worldwide investment in women.



Some, though, are calling the fund hypocritical for appearing similar to the Clinton Foundation.

President Trump had criticized the Clinton Foundation for accepting funds from countries with human rights concerns -- calling it pay-for-play. This women's fund, though, is exclusively run by the World Bank.


 9 
 on: Today at 02:27:18 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by Crafty_Dog
Citations on that?  We need something specific to respond to the innuendo that is sure to come.

 10 
 on: Today at 02:26:10 PM 
Started by Crafty_Dog - Last post by Crafty_Dog
Trump and Israel: Enemies of the System

May 22, 2017     Caroline Glick

The United States is sailing in uncharted waters today as the intelligence-security community wages an all-but-declared rebellion against President Donald Trump.

Deputy Attorney-General Rod Rosensteinís decision on Wednesday to appoint former FBI director Robert Mueller to serve as a special counsel charged with investigating allegations of ďany links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump,Ē is the latest and so far most significant development in this grave saga.

Who are the people seeking to unseat Trump? This week we learned that the powers at play are deeply familiar. Trumpís nameless opponents are some of Israelís greatest antagonists in the US security establishment.

This reality was exposed this week with intelligence leaks related to Trumpís meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. To understand what happened, letís start with the facts that are undisputed about that meeting.

The main thing that is not in dispute is that during his meeting with Lavrov, Trump discussed Islamic Stateís plan to blow up passenger flights with bombs hidden in laptop computers.

Itís hard to find fault with Trumpís actions. First of all, the ISIS plot has been public knowledge for several weeks.

Second, the Russians are enemies of ISIS. Moreover, Russia has a specific interest in diminishing ISISís capacity to harm civilian air traffic. In October 2015, ISIS terrorists in Egypt downed a Moscow-bound jetliner, killing all 254 people on board with a bomb smuggled on board in a soda can.

And now on to the issues that are in dispute.

Hours after the Trump-Lavrov meeting, The Washington Post reported that in sharing information about ISISís plans, Trump exposed intelligence sources and methods to Russia and in so doing, he imperiled ongoing intelligence operations carried out by a foreign government.

The next day, The New York Times reported that the sources and methods involved were Israeli. In sharing information about the ISIS plot with Lavrov, the media reported, Trump endangered Israel.

There are two problems with this narrative.

First, Trumpís National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster insisted that there was no way that Trump could have exposed sources and methods, because he didnít know where the information on the ISIS plot that he discussed with Lavrov originated.

Second, if McMasterís version is true Ė and itís hard to imagine that McMaster would effectively say that his boss is an ignoramus if it werenít true Ė then the people who harmed Israelís security were the leakers, not Trump.

Now who are these leakers? According to the Washington Post, the leakers are members of the US intelligence community and former members of the US intelligence community, (the latter, presumably were political appointees in senior intelligence positions during the Obama administration who resigned when Trump came into office).

Israel is no stranger to this sort of operation. Throughout the Obama administration, US officials illegally leaked top secret information about Israeli operations to the media.

In 2010, a senior defense source exposed the Stuxnet computer worm to the New York Times. Stuxnet was reportedly a cyber weapon developed jointly by the US and Israel. It was infiltrated into the computer system at Iranís Bushehr nuclear reactor. It reportedly sabotaged a large quantity of centrifuges at the installation.

The revelation of Stuxnetís existence and purpose ended the operation. Moreover, much of Iranís significant cyber capabilities were reportedly developed by reverse engineering the Stuxnet.

Obama made his support for the leak clear three days before he left office. On January 17, 2017, Obama pardoned Marine Gen. James Cartwright for his role in illegally divulging the Stuxnet program to the Times.

In 2012, US officials told the media that Israel had struck targets in Syria. The leak, which was repeated several times in subsequent years, made it more dangerous for Israel to operate against Iranian and Hezbollah forces in Syria.

Also in 2012, ahead of the presidential election, US officials informed journalists that Israel was operating in air bases in Azerbaijan with the purpose of attacking Iranís nuclear sites in air strikes originating from those bases.

Israelís alleged plan to attack Iran was abruptly canceled.

In all of these cases, the goal of the leak was to harm Israel.

In contrast, the goal of this weekís leaks was to harm Trump. Israel was collateral damage.

The key point is that the leaks are coming from the same places in both cases.

All of them are members of the US intelligence community with exceedingly high security clearances. And all of them willingly committed felony offenses when they shared top secret information with reporters.

That is, all of them believe that it is perfectly all right to make political use of intelligence to advance a political goal. In the case of the anti-Israel leaks under Obama, their purpose was to prevent Israel from degrading Iranís nuclear capacity and military power at a time that Obama was working to empower Iran at Israelís expense.

In the case of the Trump-Lavrov leak, the purpose was to undermine Israelís security as a means of harming Trump politically.

What happened to the US intelligence community? How did its members come to believe that they have the right to abuse the knowledge they gained as intelligence officers in order to advance a partisan agenda? As former CIA station chief Scott Uehlinger explained in an article published in March in The Hill, the Obama administration oversaw a program of deliberate politicization of the US intelligence community.

The first major step toward this end was initiated by then-US attorney general Eric Holder in August 2009.

Holder announced then that he intended to appoint a special counsel to investigate claims that CIA officers tortured terrorists while interrogating them.

The purpose of Holderís announcement wasnít to secure indictments. The points was to transform the CIA politically and culturally.

And it worked.

Shortly after Holderís announcement, an exodus began of the CIAís best operations officers. Men and women with years of experience operating in enemy territory resigned.

Uehlingerís article related that during the Obama years, intelligence officers were required to abide by strict rules of political correctness.

In his words, ďIn this PC world, all diversity is embraced Ė except diversity of thought. Federal workers have been partisan for years, but combined with the rigid Obama PC mindset, it has created a Frankenstein of politicization that has never been seen before.Ē

Over the years, US intelligence officers at all levels have come to view themselves as soldiers in an army with its own agenda Ė which largely overlapped Obamaís.

Trumpís agenda on the other hand is viewed as anathema by members of this powerful group. Likewise, the notion of a strong Israel capable of defending its interests without American help and permission is more dangerous than the notion of Iran armed with nuclear weapons.

Given these convictions, it is no surprise that unnamed intelligence sources are leaking a tsunami of selective and deceptive intelligence against Trump and his advisers.

The sense of entitlement that prevails in the intelligence community was on prominent display in an astounding interview that Evelyn Farkas, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense, gave to MSNBS in early March.

Farkas, who resigned her position in late 2015 to work on Hillary Clintonís presidential campaign, admitted to her interviewer that the intelligence community was spying on Trump and his associates and that ahead of Obamaís departure from office, they were transferring massive amounts of intelligence information about Trump and his associates to Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill in order to ensure that those Democratic politicians would use the information gathered to harm Trump.

In her words, ďThe Trump folks, if they found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staffís dealings with RussiansÖ would try to compromise those sources and methods, meaning we would no longer have access to that information.Ē

Farkas then explained that the constant leaks of Trumpís actions to the media were part of the initiative that she had urged her counterparts to undertake.

And Farkas was proud of what her colleagues had done and were doing.

Two days after Farkasís interview, Trump published his tweet accusing former president Barack Obama of spying on him.

Although the media and the intelligence community angrily and contemptuously denied Trumpís assertion, the fact is that both Farkasís statement and information that became public both before and since Trumpís inauguration lends credence to his claim.

In the days ahead of the inauguration we learned that in the summer of 2016, Obamaís Justice Department conducted a criminal probe into suspicions that Trumpís senior aides had committed crimes in their dealings with Russian banks. Those suspicions, upon investigation, were dismissed. In other words, the criminal probe led nowhere.

Rather than drop the matter, Obamaís Justice Department decided to continue the probe but transform it into a national security investigation.

After a failed attempt in July 2016, in October 2016, a FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) court approved a Justice Department request to monitor the communications of Trumpís senior advisers. Since the subjects of the probe were working from Trumpís office and communicating with him by phone and email, the warrant requested Ė which the FISA court granted Ė also subjected Trumpís direct communications to incidental collection.

So from at least October 2016 through Trumpís inauguration, the US intelligence community was spying on Trump and his advisers, despite the fact that they were not suspected of committing any crimes.

This brings us back to this weekís Russia story which together with the media hysteria following Trumpís firing of FBI director James Comey, precipitated Rosensteinís decision to appoint Mueller to serve as a special counsel charged with investigating the allegations that Trump and or his advisers acted unlawfully or in a manner that endangered the US in their dealings with Russia.

It is too early to judge how Mueller will conduct his investigation. But if the past is any guide, he is liable to keep the investigation going indefinitely, paralyzing Trumpís ability to conduct foreign policy in relation to Russia and a host of other issues.

This then brings us to Trump and Israel Ė the twin targets of the US intelligence communityís felonious and injurious leaks.

The fact that Trump will be coming to Israel next week may be a bit of fortuitous timing. Given the stakes involved for Trump, for Israel and for US national security, perhaps Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can develop a method of fighting this cabal of faceless, lawless foes together.

How such a fight would look and what it would involve is not immediately apparent and anyways should never be openly discussed. But the fact is that working together, Israel and Trump may accomplish more than either can accomplish on their own. And with so much hanging in the balance, it makes sense to at least try.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!