Dog Brothers Public Forum
Return To Homepage
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 25, 2014, 07:43:03 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
83418 Posts in 2260 Topics by 1067 Members
Latest Member: Shinobi Dog
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Politics & Religion
| | |-+  Abortion
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print
Author Topic: Abortion  (Read 26781 times)
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #150 on: October 22, 2013, 10:10:43 PM »

Do a search on Sanger at discover the networks.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=1816

Margaret Higgins Sanger was a radical feminist, eugenicist, Marxist, and the founder of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
...
According to her New York Times obituary, she sought to encourage birth control and/or abortion among “subnormal children.”
...
(1939) Sanger turned her attention specifically to the reproductive practices of black Americans. She selected former ABCL director Clarence J. Gamble (of the Procter and Gamble company) to become BCFA's southern regional director. That November, Gamble drew up a memorandum titled "Suggestion for Negro Project," whose ultimate aim was to decrease the black birth rate significantly. Anticipating that black leaders would be suspicious of anyone exhorting African Americans to have fewer children, Gamble suggested that BCFA place black leaders in high positions within the organization, so as to give the appearance that they were in charge of the group's agendas. BCFA presented birth control as a vehicle for the upward economic mobility of blacks.
---------------------------------------

More relevant today than racism in the previous century is the way abortion hits black babies now, killing them at a rate three times that of the white ones.  Imagine if that was a Republican policy!  What liberal over at Planned Parenthood or DNC or MSM has ever expressed concern much less outrage over that?

Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #151 on: October 23, 2013, 09:16:26 AM »

http://www.twincities.com/crime/ci_24355935/attorneys-apple-valley-man-charged-killing-wife-unborn?source=hottopics

Attorneys for Apple Valley man argue fetus' death was an abortion
10/21/2013

When an Apple Valley woman died in March, her 15-week-old fetus, too young to survive outside the womb, died with her.

Margorie Holland's husband, Roger Holland, is charged with murder in the deaths. But with his trial scheduled for Monday, his attorneys are making a novel argument: The death of the fetus was an abortion, not a murder, and the only person whose rights that such an act could have violated -- the mother -- already was dead.
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #152 on: January 14, 2014, 09:33:05 AM »

It seems to me that the longer you wait and the more you need to mull the decision over as the fetus develops, the more you admit there is another life involved.  At some point this goes from women's rights, rape victim, mistake etc. to ending an innocent life.  Can we all at least agree on that? 

The answer, according to the Supreme Court and this NY Times editorial, is NO:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/14/opinion/abortion-rights-a-good-ruling-stands.html?ref=opinion&_r=1
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #153 on: January 14, 2014, 10:29:46 AM »

Thanks to the judicial imperialism of SCOTUS in 1973, this issue has been dividing America ever since.  20 weeks seems quite a reasonable legal compromise to me.  That after all this time and societal turmoil SCOTUS cannot agree to even 20 weeks is profoundly discouraging.  The standard of survivability makes no sense at all because the point of reference changes as technology improves.  Surely even by the logic of the Choicers' argument the standard must have reference to the state of development of the zygote/fetus/baby?
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #154 on: January 21, 2014, 07:58:23 PM »

http://www.equip.org/articles/peter-singers-bold-defense-of-infanticide/#christian-books-2
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #155 on: February 04, 2014, 07:34:59 AM »


http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/a_slow_slog_toward_success

http://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/teasing_out_the_facts_in_the_latest_abortion_report
« Last Edit: February 04, 2014, 07:36:51 AM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #156 on: February 05, 2014, 09:44:55 PM »

It's called the 'Roe effect'.  A lot of the women that would be likely to abort at this point in time were themselves aborted under the rights established in the Roe decision. 
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #157 on: February 05, 2014, 11:40:15 PM »

OUCH!!! 
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #158 on: April 25, 2014, 08:35:49 AM »



http://www.glennbeck.com/2014/04/24/aborted-babies-incinerated-as-part-of-waste-to-energy-plant-in-the-united-states/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #159 on: May 13, 2014, 09:09:57 AM »

http://blog.heritage.org/2014/05/13/kermit-gosnell-anniversary-late-term-abortion/?utm_source=heritagefoundation&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=morningbell
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #160 on: May 13, 2014, 10:09:31 AM »

Imagine this with the politics reversed and you would have a story.  What if liberals cared about protecting the weakest and most innocent among us.  What if tea partiers supported widespread use of a procedure that was killing off African-American unborn at 3 times the rate of that for Caucasian-Americans.  What if the Koch brothers were caught paying $1.2 Billion, financing the equivalent of 2.7 million abortions, killing the unborn of the poor and non-white disproportionately.  And what if the Supreme Court wouldn't let even a majority of good caring liberals stop them, in any state, for any reason...


"... liberal billionaire Warren Buffett has donated more than $1.2 billion to abortion organizations from 2001 to 2012.  That’s equal to the cost of roughly 2.7 million first-trimester abortions – more than twice the number of abortions that occur in an entire year in the United States.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2014/05/13/warren-buffet-donates-12-billion-to-abortion-groups/
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #161 on: May 13, 2014, 11:34:19 AM »


Note to the bloody Dr. Gosnell, former Speaker of the House Nanacy Pelosi and former State Senator from Iliinois, Barack Obama:  If the baby is flopping on the table, it isn't a late term abortion that you are performing, NO MATTER the wishes of the mother.

From Crafty's link:  "Poll after poll shows the majority of Americans support [a limit on abortions after 20 weeks] and women are more in favor of a 20-week limit than men."

Note to all current and future tea party candidates:  There isn't a political possibility of forcing rape victims to carry pregnancy to full term.  If you oppose abortion, then focus on what is politically possible - where we have wide and deep political agreement - which is to place a limit on late term abortions, the most human-like of all the fetuses. 
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 12128


« Reply #162 on: May 25, 2014, 08:11:59 PM »

My wife was reading a Chinese website and saw an article on how some Chinese were eating late term aborted fetuses. I wish I could unsee the photos from the article.

Horror.
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #163 on: June 19, 2014, 11:16:04 AM »

http://fineartamerica.com/featured/the-wait-and-the-reward-anna-bain.html
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #164 on: July 02, 2014, 09:09:55 AM »

Seen on a bumper sticker yesterday:

"If it isn't a baby, you aren't pregnant."
« Last Edit: July 02, 2014, 01:38:04 PM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 6094


« Reply #165 on: September 23, 2014, 10:36:06 AM »

Liberal groups push poor women and black women into abortion.
Gender selection abortions are killing girls by the tens of millions. 
12 out of 12 recent studies link Abortion to Breast Cancer.
But Republicans are prosecuting a war on women by trying to slow all of that.

http://www.presentation-r2l.org/twelve-out-of-twelve-recent-studies-show-abortion-linked-to-breast-cancer/

Abortion box score: one dead, one injured.
-----------------------------------------------------------

Gender selection abortions are not just in Asia!

"...among American families of Chinese, Korean and Indian descent, the likelihood of having a boy increased to 1.17 to 1 if the first child was a girl, according to the Columbia economists. If the first two children were girls, the ratio for a third child was 1.51 to 1 — or about 50 percent greater — in favor of boys."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/nyregion/15babies.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

No wonder Asian American women vote Democrat.  You wouldn't want to lose a woman's right to gender select by killing off your own baby girls.  It's legal if you make that choice early enough.  And this offends no one?
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 31679


« Reply #166 on: October 11, 2014, 01:04:23 PM »

http://www.capoliticalreview.com/capoliticalnewsandviews/this-alabama-judge-has-figured-out-how-to-dismantle-roe-v-wade/ 
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!