Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2017, 05:22:55 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
101849 Posts in 2376 Topics by 1089 Members
Latest Member: Sarge
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Science, Culture, & Humanities
| | |-+  Environmental issues
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] Print
Author Topic: Environmental issues  (Read 170436 times)
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8693


« Reply #400 on: January 18, 2017, 12:54:41 PM »


As long as they don't change the methodology, that will always be true.
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 39836


« Reply #401 on: January 18, 2017, 10:57:53 PM »

http://thefederalist.com/2017/01/18/nyt-hid-numbers-hottest-year-record/#.WIA-4Q2C8kt.facebook
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8693


« Reply #402 on: January 18, 2017, 11:15:53 PM »


-59 in Alaska right while the hottest year ever story again goes to print.

https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/weather/2017/01/18/50-below-recorded-in-interior-as-cold-snap-settles-on-alaska/

Weather or climate, warning is less when you measure it than when you adjust it.

Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 39836


« Reply #403 on: February 24, 2017, 09:09:47 PM »

http://kirkmellish.blog.wsbradio.com/2017/02/23/just-how-warm-any-chill/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 39836


« Reply #404 on: February 25, 2017, 01:02:22 AM »

second post

http://news.wisc.edu/from-rocks-in-colorado-evidence-of-a-chaotic-solar-system/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 39836


« Reply #405 on: February 26, 2017, 03:41:16 PM »

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921818116304787
Logged
DDF
Power User
***
Posts: 760


« Reply #406 on: February 28, 2017, 12:23:32 PM »

Climate change. What an MIT Professor dedicated to the subject for more than 30 years has to say about it.

https://www.prageru.com/courses/environmental-science/climate-change-what-do-scientists-say
Logged

Do not fear going anywhere, nor doing anything. You will die where you are supposed to.
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 39836


« Reply #407 on: March 15, 2017, 04:11:33 PM »

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/science/great-barrier-reef-coral-climate-change-dieoff.html?emc=edit_ta_20170315&nl=top-stories&nlid=49641193&ref=cta
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 6915


« Reply #408 on: March 21, 2017, 08:15:55 AM »

Barrier reef not in danger???:
https://climatism.wordpress.com/2016/12/08/great-barrier-reef-expert-dont-trust-climate-alarmists/
Logged
DDF
Power User
***
Posts: 760


« Reply #409 on: March 21, 2017, 10:36:00 AM »


Nature has existed since the beginning of time, in a state of perpetual perfection unto itself, regardless of what man did or did not "think" about it, and it will continue to do so, for as long as man is or isn't here, man himself, being a part of the same system and just as subjective to nature as anything else.

Logged

Do not fear going anywhere, nor doing anything. You will die where you are supposed to.
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14518


« Reply #410 on: March 23, 2017, 11:26:15 PM »


The media would never lie to us. They are Professional Journalists! With credentials!
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8693


« Reply #411 on: March 24, 2017, 12:18:39 PM »

GM:  "The media would never lie to us. They are Professional Journalists! With credentials!"

And that's why they covered this science story so widely and boldly...

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170306091927.htm

Cold extermination: One of greatest mass extinctions was due to an ice age and not to Earth's warming
Date:  March 6, 2017
Source: Université de Genève

The Earth has known several mass extinctions over the course of its history. One of the most important happened at the Permian-Triassic boundary 250 million years ago. Over 95% of marine species disappeared and, up until now, scientists have linked this extinction to a significant rise in Earth temperatures. But researchers have now discovered that this extinction took place during a short ice age which preceded the global climate warming.
------------------------------------------------------

Can someone please link the NY Times coverage of this catastrophic global warming refutation.

Correction coming soon to the Washington Post:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A24732-2005Jan20.html
Extinction Tied to Global Warming
Greenhouse Effect Cited in Mass Decline 250 Million Years Ago
January 21, 2005

Oops.  No so!


Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 39836


« Reply #412 on: March 26, 2017, 12:01:00 AM »

http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/simple-chart-destroys-the-liberal-climate-change-scam?utm_source=FBLC&utm_medium=FB&utm_campaign=LC
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8693


« Reply #413 on: April 04, 2017, 09:48:49 AM »

Ken Haapala of the Science and Environmental Policy Project
http://www.sepp.org/twtwfiles/2017/TWTW4-1-17.pdf

In the 30 years between the 1979 Charney report to the National Academy of Sciences on an investigation of the possible effects of increased carbon dioxide on the earth’s temperatures to the 2009 EPA’s finding that carbon dioxide, and other greenhouse gases, endanger human health and welfare, government-funded Climate Studies have largely turned from empirical science to dogma – a belief system unsubstantiated by physical evidence.

The Charney report included some of the nation’s best meteorologists and climate researchers and the report recognized that laboratory tests demonstrated that the direct influence on global temperatures from doubling carbon dioxide would be minor – possibly unmeasurable.

The report also identified educated guesses – estimates – that the CO2 influence might be greatly enhanced by increases in water vapor – the dominant greenhouse gas. If correct, this positive feedback would greatly multiply any increase from CO2. The report recognized that the warming would occur in the atmosphere, and that we did not have comprehensive measurements of atmospheric temperatures. Thus, the hypothesis of significant atmospheric warming from increased water vapor could not be tested.

[Now, of course, it can be, and is, being tested.]

In March 1990, Science Magazine published a paper by Roy Spencer and John Christy describing a method of using data collected from NOAA polar orbiting weather satellites to comprehensively calculate atmospheric temperatures for virtually the entire globe, except for the extreme poles. These data cover about 97 to 98 percent of the globe, including oceans, deserts, mountain ranges, jungles, etc. where there are few surface instruments. Initially, certain small errors in calculation were discovered, including orbital decay. These were acknowledged and corrected. This is how science advances.

These data, published monthly, are independently calculated by two other entities and are independently verified by four sets of weather balloon data using different instruments. The government-sponsored United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) the US Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), and the EPA largely ignore the atmospheric data, which is far more comprehensive and better tested than surface data.

[Not only are the satellite data more comprehensive and better tested than surface data, they haven’t been tampered with. Government-funded warmists at NOAA and other agencies have systematically altered historical surface temperature data by lowering temperatures that were recorded decades ago, and raising temperatures that have been reported recently. The surface temperature record has been so badly corrupted that it is doubtful whether it can be used to prove anything at all. Yet government-funded warmists rely on it to the exclusion of the transparent satellite data.]

Unfortunately, subsequent government-funded research went from properly testing the educated guesses (hypotheses) in the Charney Report to using them to create fear of global warming, now called climate change. Economically drastic programs and government policies have been justified based on these untested guesses.

From 1993 to 2016, the US government spent over $40 Billion on what government entities classify Climate Science – and has produced no refinement to the 1979 Charney Report.

[Where did that $40 billion go? It didn’t buy any battleships, or pay for the construction of transcontinental highways. An enormous portion of it must have gone into the pockets of “scientists” who were generating the scary reports that left-wing government agencies wanted.]

Independent scientists and climate researchers have produced far better estimates of the influence of CO2, based on empirical (scientific) observations. But that research is not included in official government publications.

Public policies on energy and the environment should be based on the best available empirical science, not on incomplete studies, which have become dogma.

On March 29, the U.S. House Committee on Science Space & and Technology held a hearing titled “Climate Science: Assumptions, Policy Implications, and the Scientific Method” featuring climate scientists John Christy, Judith Curry, Michael Mann, and Roger Pielke Jr., who recently left the field, in part because of abusive tactics by certain members of Congress. Comparing the written testimony of John Christy with that of Michael Mann provides a stark illustration of the difference between empirical science and scientific dogma.

[http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/04/science-vs-dogma-on-climate.php]
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!