Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 26, 2017, 11:52:47 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
103804 Posts in 2387 Topics by 1091 Members
Latest Member: Phorize
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Politics & Religion
| | |-+  Corruption, Sleaze, Skullduggery, and Treason
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] Print
Author Topic: Corruption, Sleaze, Skullduggery, and Treason  (Read 72175 times)
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #300 on: May 24, 2017, 04:30:20 PM »


Impossible! The dems would never politicize law enforcement!
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #301 on: May 26, 2017, 11:20:16 AM »

http://circa.com/politics/declassified-memos-show-fbi-illegally-shared-spy-data-on-americans-with-private-parties
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #302 on: May 26, 2017, 01:29:02 PM »

 shocked shocked shocked angry angry angry angry angry angry
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #303 on: May 26, 2017, 04:13:30 PM »

What 3rd parties?

Could this be why Comey would not investigate leaks?
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #304 on: May 29, 2017, 01:55:00 PM »

http://freebeacon.com/politics/nearly-half-dem-rep-luis-gutierrezs-first-quarter-campaign-expenditures-went-wife/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #305 on: June 05, 2017, 01:11:07 PM »

http://americanlookout.com/john-kerry-scandal-update-he-knew-state-dept-was-funneling-cash-to-daughters-non-profit/?t=c
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #306 on: June 05, 2017, 06:59:27 PM »

She needs jail time:

http://boingboing.net/2017/06/05/reality-leigh-winner-arrested.html
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #307 on: June 05, 2017, 07:10:47 PM »


Mishandling classified materials is illegal? What if it was on a private server?
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #308 on: June 06, 2017, 07:52:42 PM »

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2017/06/06/how-donald-trump-shifted-kids-cancer-charity-money-into-his-business/#30f95ccc6b4a
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #309 on: June 12, 2017, 09:12:03 AM »

At first glance I though "an honest Democrat?".  But the next thought to me is this is just a ruse .   This is just to justify her going after Trump.   If he should not have "interfered" with Comey then how could she legitimately ignore what he said about Loretta Lynn?   

Would Feinstein be calling for this if not for the obstruction of justice calls against Trump?

If she did it would be far more shocking then now.

http://nypost.com/2017/06/11/top-democrat-calls-for-investigation-of-loretta-lynchs-clinton-probe/
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #310 on: June 12, 2017, 03:24:29 PM »

My God:
 shocked angry:

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/trump-insider-pursuing-bid-fbi-building-contract-raising-112604633--abc-news-topstories.html
« Last Edit: June 14, 2017, 12:20:52 PM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #311 on: June 16, 2017, 11:32:56 PM »

In that accusations will be made regardless of the facts, I post this here:


http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/338208-trumps-financial-disclosure-released
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #312 on: June 20, 2017, 05:54:16 AM »

to Obama library:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/19/judicial-watch-susan-rice-unmasking-documents-moved-from-nsc-to-obama-library/
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #313 on: June 20, 2017, 07:09:05 AM »


Yeah, not a smidgen of corruption!
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #314 on: June 20, 2017, 10:10:39 PM »

Source unknown

http://www.youngcons.com/ariz-sen-john-mccains-foundation-funded-by-anti-american-leftist-billionaire-george-soros/?ref=FacebookPost
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #315 on: June 21, 2017, 07:50:51 AM »

   
"McCain funded by Soros?"

I saw this too and am surprised.

From everything we have read about Soros it is not likely it is because Soros thinks of McCain as a hero or great American
It is because he thinks of him as a useful idiot!

Which he often is!   
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8939


« Reply #316 on: June 21, 2017, 08:22:56 AM »

"McCain funded by Soros?"
I saw this too and am surprised.
From everything we have read about Soros it is not likely it is because Soros thinks of McCain as a hero or great American
It is because he thinks of him as a useful idiot!
Which he often is!   

I can only think that to Soros, the alternative to McCain would be a more tea party like Republican challenger.

Soros money didn't successfully buy the Georgia election.   )
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #317 on: July 02, 2017, 11:51:43 AM »

http://www.salon.com/2017/03/06/trumps-hotel-and-tower-in-azerbaijan-is-ties-to-an-iranian-terrorist-group/
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #318 on: July 02, 2017, 12:09:35 PM »


How is Salon's coverage of the Clinton crime family's business dealings?
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #319 on: July 02, 2017, 01:00:54 PM »

Non-existent I would imagine, but that affects me not at all.  We search for Truth here and Trump's substantial international holdings present unique issues.  Given Trump's willingness over the years to take chances with issues regarding integrity (e.g. the apparent grifting operation that was Trump U) it behooves us to keep an eye on things like this.
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #320 on: July 02, 2017, 01:07:12 PM »

Non-existent I would imagine, but that affects me not at all.  We search for Truth here and Trump's substantial international holdings present unique issues.  Given Trump's willingness over the years to take chances with issues regarding integrity (e.g. the apparent grifting operation that was Trump U) it behooves us to keep an eye on things like this.

I'm sorry, I can't keep track of the left's narratives. Is it "Trump is pissing off everyone in the world, threatening national security"? or is it "Trump's global business dealings are threatening national security" today?

From the article, the project was never built. Gosh, let's compare and contrast that with the boatloads of cash Obama had directly shipped to IRAN.
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #321 on: July 02, 2017, 01:12:06 PM »

http://www.salon.com/2017/06/28/6-trigger-points-how-the-conflict-between-the-united-states-and-iran-is-fast-escalating-toward-war_partner/

Obviously to cover up his business dealings with Iran, Trump is rushing us to war with Iran. Makes perfect sense!
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #322 on: July 09, 2017, 07:52:29 PM »


http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/07/08/military-judge-gives-bowe-bergdahl-lot-bad-news/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #323 on: July 12, 2017, 12:48:25 PM »

https://townhall.com/columnists/brentbozell/2017/07/12/l-brent-bozell-iii-and-tim-graham-n2353596
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 14999


« Reply #324 on: July 12, 2017, 12:56:36 PM »


Twenty years ago this summer, Congress investigated this "Asiagate" plot while then-Sen. Fred Thompson's hearings produced one embarrassing detail after another about the Democrats. How did the press report these damning developments? They bad-mouthed the hearings as a waste of money and buried them under massive coverage of tabloid-ish stories of death -- first, the murder of fashion designer Gianni Versace in July, and then the accidental death of Princess Diana in August.


*Collusion* <------  Shiny thing. Pay no attention to massive voter fraud.
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7239


« Reply #325 on: July 13, 2017, 11:55:58 AM »

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/sheldon-silver-conviction-tossed-new-york/2017/07/13/id/801425/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40639


« Reply #326 on: July 23, 2017, 04:12:53 PM »



Keep OPEC out of Wall Street
by Gal Luft
IAGS Journal of Energy Security
July 19, 2017
http://www.meforum.org/6829/keep-opec-out-of-wall-street
 
 
Share:   

  Be the first of your friends to like this.
 
 
Saudi Arabia is being wooed by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE) over the listing of Saudi Aramco in what would be the largest IPO in history.
For the past several months two of the world's leading stock exchanges the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the London Stock Exchange (LSE) - have been competing over the listing of Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia's national oil company, in what would be the largest IPO in history.
Delegations from both exchanges have traveled to Riyadh to woo government officials to select them. The LSE has even offered to bend its listing rules to accommodate the Saudi intention to float only five percent of Aramco as according to current rules a company qualifies for premium listing only if it offers at least 25 percent of its shares. Both President Donald Trump and British Prime Minster Theresa May recently visited Riyadh to bolster the relations with the Saudis in part to influence their decision on the matter.
But for the Saudis the choice between New York and London is not an easy one. Prince Mohammad Bin Salman, who was recently installed as the Kingdom's crown prince and who is considered the mastermind of the IPO, prefers an NYSE listing which would solidify US-Saudi relations even beyond the recent $350 billion arms deal between the two countries. Aramco executives on the other hand prefer London as there, they believe, the company would be more protected from shareholders lawsuits over not only the conduct of the company but also that of the Saudi government. To date no decision has been made.
No one can blame the owners of those exchanges for their eagerness. The same is true for the underwriters of the IPO like Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan or the various consultancies and law firms benefiting from lucrative retainers and consulting fees associated with the offering. With an estimated valuation of $2 trillion the five percent Aramco will be offering the public are valued at $100 billion - more than the combined value of the top five largest IPOs ever floated in New York City. With such a bonanza every crumb is a mountain of cash. But from the broader public's perspective things look vastly different. The Aramco IPO is a test of the integrity of our financial system and under the current structure no democratic government which believes in free and open markets should expose its investors to such an offering.
It's not clear that Aramco is willing to remove the veil of secrecy from its books.
From the first time the idea of an IPO was announced it was fraught with serious questions. Taking public a company like Aramco would entail disclosures the company was never willing to make. For example, it would have to share with investors its detailed geological data, its well by well production costs, its precise financial relations with the Saudi government and its hiring and operating procedures. All of those have been closely guarded state secrets. But transparency and the equal availability of information to every investor are the bedrock of our financial market. This requires Aramco to remove the veil of secrecy from its books, and it is not clear that the Saudi government, which effectively runs Aramco, is genuinely ready to do so.
An even more troubling set of questions has to do with what can be called the five-versus-95- percent problem. While the Saudis sell five percent of Aramco to the public they keep the other 95 percent under tight government control. How will this work exactly? Which assets or business segments will fall within the five percent? What will be their interaction with the rest of the company? Will shareholders of the five percent be accountable to decisions made by the 95 percent? Who decides? The issue is particularly relevant since while the five percent will supposedly be governed by free market forces, the 95 percent will be effectively controlled by a price fixing cartel, OPEC the complete antithesis of the free market.
The Saudis are only selling 5% of Aramco to the public. 95% will remain under government control.
OPEC members collectively own more than two thirds of the world's conventional crude reserves and they account for one third of global production. Over the past forty years non-OPEC production has doubled yet the cartel's production has barely changed and is around 32 million barrels per day. It can manipulate oil prices at will in ways no other player in the oil market can.
Saudi Arabia is not only the largest producer within OPEC, it is OPEC. Time and again it has been demonstrated that Saudi Arabia is the driving force behind the cartel's decisions, including the most recent one to extend oil production cuts in order to support prices. The other thirteen members are merely supporting actors. Since oil export is the main source of income for the Saudi government, OPEC's decisions will always be subservient to the Kingdom's budgetary needs. Once floated in New York, Aramco stock will be present in every portfolio of every pension fund, mutual fund and premium stock index. This means that one way or another most Americans will be invested in it and by extension most Americans will be forced to be in collusion with a cartel and at times benefit from its price fixing.

The US and British governments must take a firm stand against Saudi influence in our financial markets.

The association with OPEC will put in legal jeopardy any oil executive wishing to hold fiduciary responsibility in Aramco. Under US law, officers of companies engaged in price fixing go to jail, but executives of OPEC members are doing so in broad daylight every few months in Vienna. However, bringing Aramco under American or British securities law will change the rules for those executives and expose them and possibly also the exchange that hosts the stock - to numerous lawsuits. This will deter western executives from assuming positions in Aramco, leading the company to be governed by a cabal of Saudi royals enjoying diplomatic immunity rather than seasoned oil professionals.

One of the most important roles of government in the economy is the elimination of cartels. Allowing the Aramco IPO while Saudi Arabia remains at the helm of OPEC would bring the most objectionable form of market distortion into the heart of our financial system. It is therefore necessary that both the US and British governments take a firm and unified stand and face Saudi Arabia with the stark choice: leave OPEC or stay out of our financial markets.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!