Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 03, 2016, 02:00:29 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
94267 Posts in 2307 Topics by 1081 Members
Latest Member: Martel
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Politics & Religion
| | |-+  The Hillbillary Clintons long, sordid, and often criminal history
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] Print
Author Topic: The Hillbillary Clintons long, sordid, and often criminal history  (Read 133720 times)
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1050 on: April 05, 2016, 01:48:53 PM »

http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/the-clinton-shell-game/
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1051 on: April 06, 2016, 12:43:51 PM »

http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/06/any-one-of-these-four-laws-could-put-hillary-aides-in-jail/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1052 on: April 06, 2016, 01:38:37 PM »

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/31/one-shot-at-queen-fbi-ag-intensify-focus-on-clinton-email-probe.html?intcmp=hpbt1
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1053 on: April 06, 2016, 03:24:35 PM »

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/clinton-campaign-chief-linked-to-russian-bank-listed-in-panama-papers/article/2587741?custom_click=rss
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1054 on: April 13, 2016, 09:22:49 AM »

http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/12/bill-de-blasio-hillary-clinton/

And then puts the blame for the joke back on deblahsio.
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1055 on: April 13, 2016, 01:02:45 PM »

We all know more or less how it is going to play out in the end, but watching it happen while being helpless is just so frustrating.  Like being robbed by the entertainment industry without any real recourse:

http://thefederalist.com/2016/04/13/how-hillary-clintons-misuse-of-classified-documents-alters-u-s-law/
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1056 on: April 14, 2016, 05:43:45 PM »

Hillary pays female executives 38% less than men

There ought to be a law against this - leftist hypocrisy.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2016/04/14/of-course-clinton-foundation-pays-female-executives-38-percent-less-than-male-counterparts-n2148105
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1057 on: April 18, 2016, 08:27:35 AM »

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/04/17/hillary-clinton-dances-stage-ny-officials/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1058 on: April 19, 2016, 12:22:19 AM »

http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/17/exclusive-disgraced-clinton-donor-got-13m-in-state-dept-grants-under-hillary/
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13460


« Reply #1059 on: April 19, 2016, 08:24:15 AM »



you want.
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1060 on: April 19, 2016, 10:36:31 AM »

https://www.google.com/search?q=hillary+chairman+mao+outfit&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj2rJ2_g5vMAhUJrD4KHaD1Dy4Q7AkIKQ&biw=1440&bih=805#imgrc=_
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1061 on: April 19, 2016, 12:04:00 PM »

http://www.dickmorris.com/hillary-shields-her-saudi-donors-dick-morris-tv-lunch-alert/?utm_source=dmreports&utm_medium=dmreports&utm_campaign=dmreports
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1062 on: April 19, 2016, 09:37:34 PM »

http://www.glennbeck.com/2016/04/19/re-surfaced-sex-allegation-could-be-hillary-clintons-biggest-nightmare/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20160419GlennBeckDailyV4_C&utm_term=Smart%20List%20-%20Responsive%20Group%20Control
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1063 on: April 20, 2016, 11:37:27 AM »

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/04/20/sheriff-clarke-hillary-clintons-hot-sauce-remarks-im-surprised-didnt-say-watermelon/
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1064 on: April 22, 2016, 03:14:08 PM »

The only question is how will the Dems get her out of it.  Not if:

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/04/22/judge-napolitano-fbi-has-evidence-indict-and-convict-hillary-clinton-email-scandal
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1065 on: April 22, 2016, 10:57:53 PM »

http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/yoko-ono-i-had-an-affair-with-hillary-clinton-in-the-70s/?utm_campaign=shareaholic&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=socialnetwork
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13460


« Reply #1066 on: April 22, 2016, 11:20:32 PM »


Yoko-Broke up the Beatles.

Hillary-Will break up America.
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1067 on: April 22, 2016, 11:31:29 PM »

1) 

http://www.wsj.com/video/opinion-journal-hillarys-spin-on-benghazi/EB06B6AD-5C19-488F-8FE5-1333AE04534F.html?utm_source=EmailDirect.com&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=4-22-16+weekly+update+Campaign

========================================================================


2)  State Department Belatedly Releases New Hillary Clinton Benghazi Documents
Another piece of the scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton and Benghazi fell into place this week when the State Department released to us new documents containing telephone transcripts from the evening of September 12, 2012.

The documents reveal that the then-Secretary of State informed then-Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil that the deadly terrorist attack on the U.S. compound the day before "had nothing to do with the film."

You will recall that on the evening of September 11, Mrs. Clinton issued an official State Department press statement, approved by the White House, placing the blame for the attack on an Internet video:

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

Yet the next day, September 12, in her conversation with Kandil, Clinton said, "We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack - not a protest." Kandil responded, "You're not kidding. Based on the information we saw today we believe that group that claimed responsibility for this is affiliated with al-Qaeda."

Nevertheless, two days later, at the ceremony when the bodies of the four Americans who were killed arrived in the United States, Clinton again left the implication that it was all due to the video:

"This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We've seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We've seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with."

This became an administration theme. On September 16, then-UN Ambassador Susan Rice, appearing on all the Sunday morning political talk shows, invoked the video. For example, she told Jake Tapper of ABC:

"But our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous - not a premeditated - response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated."

There are actually two scandals here. The first is Hillary Clinton telling different stories to different foreign leaders about the Benghazi attack - including an admission that it was a terrorist attack.

The second is the State Department's cover-up of these documents. The department has forced Judicial Watch to play 'whack-a-mole' with Clinton and Benghazi documents. It is no wonder that two frustrated federal court judges granted Judicial Watch discovery into the Clinton FOIA issues.

Here's the story on that.

Clinton's admission to Kandil was first revealed to the Select Committee on Benghazi on October 13, 2015 and publicized on the day of Mrs. Clinton's testimony, October 22. However, court filings in Judicial Watch litigation show that the record was only produced after two federal court judges ordered the State Department to produce more Benghazi-related records to us.

Similarly, our litigation also forced the release of the September 11, 2012, email in which Clinton informed her daughter that the attack had been staged by an "Al Qaeda-like group," rather than as the result of "inflammatory material posted on the Internet," as Mrs. Clinton had claimed in her official public statement one hour earlier. (So, the two big reveals of the Benghazi Select Committee during Clinton's testimony only came about because of your Judicial Watch - and despite the incompetence of Congress.)

The State Department had previously told a federal court that the Kandil document wasn't responsive to Judicial Watch's request and resulting lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01511)) seeking:

Any and all records concerning, regarding, or related to notes, updates, or reports created in response to the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. This request includes, but is not limited to, notes taken by then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton or employees of the Office of the Secretary of State during the attack and its immediate aftermath.

But the State Department then delivered this information last month to us. The records, the State Department told the Court, were found among thousands of new Clinton State Department records supposedly only discovered in December, 2015 - again, two months after the key Kandil document was first produced to the Benghazi Committee.

I provide more analysis in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, which you can watch here.

Bureaucratic bungling or cover-up? What do you think?
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1068 on: April 23, 2016, 08:39:46 AM »

What if she just admitted she helped Obama spread that lie about the film to help him get re-elected?

That they didn't rescue them for the same reasons, denying there was a terror attack.

And admitted Bill convinced her to do business on the private server because of all the quid pro quo arrangements sure to develop, taking personal and Foundation enrichment in exchange for State Dept favors.

And that the Obama DOJ isn't prosecuting because no one else can win on the Democrat side.

Everyone already knows all this.  Would people like her any better if she was honest?   (No.)
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1069 on: April 23, 2016, 08:51:23 AM »


Snopes says no on the logic that if true the msm would have carried it.
http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/yokohillary.asp

So that settles it.  (?)
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13460


« Reply #1070 on: April 23, 2016, 09:47:42 AM »


Snopes isn't agenda free or impartial.
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1071 on: April 24, 2016, 11:51:08 AM »

Snopes isn't agenda free or impartial.

Agreed.  Still, not much of a source on that quote.

Coming out as gay now would be the perfect shiny object she needs to rescue her candidacy.  I just kind of doubt it. 

As an excuse for Bill's pattern of conduct, having a lesbian wife is not a free pass to be a criminal, sexual predator. 
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1072 on: April 24, 2016, 03:27:46 PM »

The Leftist hoopla begins.  It will be man 'against' woman.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/23/hillary-clinton-considers-all-female-ticket-by-choosing-woman-as/
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13460


« Reply #1073 on: April 24, 2016, 04:31:44 PM »


She would carry the fake Indian vote. So that's a plus.
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5319


« Reply #1074 on: April 26, 2016, 09:56:35 AM »

Too bad they can't link this to Obama himself:

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/state-department-hid-key-clinton-benghazi-email-from-judicial-watch/
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13460


« Reply #1075 on: April 26, 2016, 11:34:32 PM »


He knows enough to avoid a paper trail. Like how he "joked" in public about using the IRS to punish his enemies, and then funny enough, guess what happens....
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1076 on: April 27, 2016, 10:25:56 AM »

http://m.hannity.com/articles/war-on-terror-487284/bombshell-email-from-libyan-embassy-specifically-14087758/
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1077 on: April 27, 2016, 11:39:45 AM »

This could go in so many threads, crony governmentism, rigged economy, housing crash, corruption, white collar crime etc, but the most immediate relevance is his affiliation with the Clintons.  Why do you suppose that is so?  When I bought foreclosures, I was limited by the amount of money I had to invest.  When Friends of Hillary do it, free money, no limits.  Stories like this conflate resentment for others' success with all the corruption that makes some of it possible.  There is nothing like watching a liberal look out for the little guy - he caused foreclosures, bought foreclosures, then refuses to rent to anyone who had a foreclosure.  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guy Who Screwed America’s Economy Hearts Hillary Clinton

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/04/26/the-guy-who-screwed-america-s-economy-hearts-hillary-clinton.html

The man behind Goldman Sachs’s infamous bets on the housing collapse now buys foreclosed homes and rents them out—but not to anyone convicted of a financial crime. He’s also a big Clinton donor.
Wall Street is buying Main Street one foreclosed home at a time.
The houses—more than 200,000 of them—are then rented to folks who continue to struggle in the aftermath of a near financial collapse in 2008.

And one of the leading figures in Wall Street’s scavenging of the wreckage created by Wall Street is also a big-time backer of Hillary Clinton.

His name is Donald Mullen, and he was once the global head of credit at Goldman Sachs. He was credited with devising the infamous “big short,” by which the firm bet bigger than big that the housing market would collapse even as it was urging customers to invest in it.
“Sounds like we will make some serious money,” he famously emailed colleagues in 2007, at early signs of the impending implosion.

Mullen left Goldman Sachs in 2012 and made some more serious money by becoming one of a number of Wall Streeters who are acquiring and leasing thousands of foreclosed homes.
Mullen embarked on this new endeavor with Curt Schade, formerly a managing director at Bear Stearns, which failed at the start of the financial crisis. Mullen and Schade received a $400 million credit line from Deutsche Bank, which survived thanks to billions of dollars in direct and indirect financial support from the government.
 
The new firm came to be called Progress Residential. The name takes on an added resonance when you visit the website of the major pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action, to which Mullen contributed $100,000 in June. You are welcomed by a picture of a smiling, waving Hillary Clinton and a message:
“The story of America is one of hard-fought, hard-won progress. And it continues today.”

The $100,000 to the pro-Clinton super PAC was noted by OpenSecrets.org and reported by various news outlets. The Washington Post has further reported that Mullen is one of 146 people who have contributed to all six of the federal races entered by either Hillary or Bill Clinton.

What has not been reported are some supreme ironies arising not so much from the money Mullen hands out but in the money he rakes in. Consider the “Rental Qualification Criteria” that a prospective tenant must pass before being granted a lease to one of the foreclosed homes that Progress Residential has acquired.
Applicants must document monthly household income of at least three times the monthly rent. Income and “credit worthiness” (PDF) are then “entered into an application scoring model to determine rental eligibility.”
But that is not all. You must also attest that you have never been convicted of any one of various felonies, including these:
“Financial crimes.”
The ban in this category applies for 10 years for those convicted of a felony, three years for a misdemeanor.
A guy who has been caught passing a bad check can forget renting one of Mullen’s houses for a decade.

That by the onetime credit chief at Goldman Sachs, which this month reached a $5.06 billion settlement with the government arising from allegations that the bank knowingly sold iffy mortgages to unsuspecting customers even as it was betting against them via Mullen’s big short.
In announcing the deal, the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, Benjamin Mizer, said, “Today’s settlement is another example of the department’s resolve to hold accountable those whose illegal conduct resulted in the financial crisis of 2008.”
Sure.
If there was illegal conduct, how come nobody was arrested?
In truth, the settlement was another example of the department’s failure to hold any individuals accountable for breaking the law.
Too big to jail.
To be completely fair to Mullen, the Goldman emails show that he at one point worried “about the representations we may be making to clients.”
But that does not seem to have stopped him from playing a major role in what followed, which is to say upending the lives of millions of people.
And he refuses to rent not only to those who have committed financial crimes but also to those who have been evicted within the past seven years.
In other words, a family could be evicted when its home is foreclosed, watch Mullen buy the house, and then find itself barred from renting any of his thousands of properties because they had been evicted.
Also barred from renting are those who have been incarcerated for a felony of any kind within the past five years; those jailed for a misdemeanor have to wait three years.
Those who survived the financial collapse without being evicted or going bankrupt or committing a crime for which Main Street if not Wall Street folks are jailed might then actually get a lease.  (more at link)
« Last Edit: April 27, 2016, 12:12:39 PM by DougMacG » Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 36601


« Reply #1078 on: April 27, 2016, 02:06:39 PM »

The Liberal Fascism thread would be a good call for this as well.
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 7794


« Reply #1079 on: April 27, 2016, 02:50:17 PM »


The email brings up another important point about having the three stooges speak for our country and run our foreign policy:

Along with the fact that it proves the narrative false is that the false narrative was used to draw attention to the video in hopes of making that a true motive for more attacks??

From the warning in the US Embassy in Tripoli:
"If we post messaging about the video specifically, we may draw unwanted attention to it."

Fits the line describing the whole Obama administration that should have been the reelection stopper:
'They made it worse.'   We have all these problems, the economy, Libya, ISIS, terrorism, the world, they made it worse.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!