Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 16, 2017, 08:55:53 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
104207 Posts in 2390 Topics by 1091 Members
Latest Member: Phorize
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Politics & Religion
| | |-+  Media, Ministry of Truth Issues
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] Print
Author Topic: Media, Ministry of Truth Issues  (Read 499142 times)
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 15040


« Reply #2100 on: July 17, 2017, 06:15:13 PM »

http://ace.mu.nu/archives/370697.php

John Sexton: The Media Is Executing the Tricks They Wargamed Out in Their "JournOList" ListServ With Abandon
Important reminder from Sexton: the JournOLists, who now occupy positions of authority in the media, and are also Agents of Infection for the herd, worked out these techniques in 2008, and are deploying them now.

The JournOlisters went into a frenzy after the Jeremiah Wright story. The three strategies they proposed for disappearing the story were (as John Sexton categorizes them) "Kill it" by smearing mainstream media people writing about the story, "Ignore it" by simply refusing to report on it at all, and smearing anyone even talking about the story as "racists."

Sexton points out that these tactics -- once considered controversial enough that even fellow JournOListers had qualms about them -- are now simply SOP for the DNC Media now:

The Journolist discussion took place nearly a decade ago, but in retrospect, I’m struck by how these three basic approaches—kill it, ignore it, call them haters—seem like media archetypes now. You can probably think of your own examples but the ones that come immediately to mind are CBS News decision to sit on video showing President Obama had not called the Benghazi attack terrorism the day after the attack.
You may recall that Obama was widely considered the loser of the 1st presidential debate with Mitt Romney. He needed a comeback win. And the winning moment of the 2nd debate was his exchange with Romney on Benghazi. Obama claimed he had called the attack terrorism the next day. But an excerpt from 60 Minutes which remained on the cutting room floor showed that wasn’t true. CBS News knew it had the clip which would cut the legs out from Obama after the 2nd debate and it sat on until a couple days before the election when it quietly posted it online.

And on that, I hear very good things about Sheryl Attkinson's new book "The Smear," which recounts all the bias and #FakeNews of the past couple of years -- most of which you've probably forgotten about, as there's so much new #FakeNews every day.

Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7328


« Reply #2101 on: July 17, 2017, 07:02:13 PM »

"The Media Is Executing the Tricks They Wargamed Out in Their "JournOList"

no doubt this is coordinated with the DNC

Rush was pointing out that the drive byes are beside themselves about other media that opposes them like drudge breitbart fox and talk radio
they are pissed they cannot control the entire conversation anymore like the scum did wiht Nxion
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2102 on: July 18, 2017, 04:30:56 PM »

http://www.westernjournalism.com/ratings-show-megyn-kellys-new-show-still-losing-viewers/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=AE&utm_campaign=can&utm_content=2017-07-17
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2103 on: July 23, 2017, 03:25:12 PM »

https://www.thelocal.de/20170721/german-media-failed-to-report-refugee-crisis-honestly-study-claims
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 15040


« Reply #2104 on: July 23, 2017, 03:32:42 PM »


Thank god journalists here are professional and honest!
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7328


« Reply #2105 on: July 24, 2017, 09:12:37 AM »

https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/2016-election-demise-journalistic-standards/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2106 on: July 27, 2017, 09:22:31 AM »

On our satellite TV, FOX is 360, FOX Business at 359 and various other news and public interest channels  are nearby.  CNN is at 202 for some reason.

Recently I noticed OAN at 347.  My wife googled a bit and apparently behind it is a San Diego businessman with other media interests as well.  I would say that OAN's orientation is "Trumpist".

There is near zero attention to the reporters and who they are.  There is near zero Washington gossip.  There are very few commercials (perhaps because the network/channel is new?).   What there is is LOTS of news about all kinds of things from around the country and around the world-- with occasional quickie segments on American history.

At present the show is one hour that repeats, with each hour replacing older segments in the one hour loop as new ones become available.

Worth keeping an eye on I'm thinking , , ,
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7328


OAN
« Reply #2107 on: July 27, 2017, 09:50:28 AM »

http://www.oann.com/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2108 on: August 01, 2017, 03:58:13 PM »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4730092/Snopes-brink-founder-accused-fraud-lying.html
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 15040


« Reply #2109 on: August 01, 2017, 04:12:22 PM »


Shocking!   rolleyes
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2110 on: August 04, 2017, 04:25:30 PM »

Need a citation for the NYT fake newsing a few days ago that DOJ was starting an investigation into anti-white discrimination but it turned out to be anti-Asian discrimination.
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2111 on: August 05, 2017, 01:38:33 PM »

http://therightscoop.com/breaking-fbi-email-dump-reveals-collusion-between-media-and-doj-to-squash-2016-lynch-clinton-meeting/#ixzz4ooNXPXxM
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2112 on: August 05, 2017, 05:04:59 PM »

second request:  I need this to shut someone the F up.


Need a citation for the NYT fake newsing a few days ago that DOJ was starting an investigation into anti-white discrimination but it turned out to be anti-Asian discrimination
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8985


« Reply #2113 on: August 05, 2017, 06:28:36 PM »

second request:  I need this to shut someone the F up.

Need a citation for the NYT fake newsing a few days ago that DOJ was starting an investigation into anti-white discrimination but it turned out to be anti-Asian discrimination

Could be this...  ?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/01/us/politics/trump-affirmative-action-universities.html?_r=0

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #2114 on: August 10, 2017, 06:57:00 PM »

The Leftmedia has one objective: To vilify the Trump administration whenever the opportunity arises. Of course, this opens the door to gross bias and stories that are just flat-out wrong. The coinage for this is the now-ubiquitous term "fake news." The New York Times was caught once again spreading propaganda in its report on the latest Climate Science Special Report (CSSR). The final draft contains the typical anxiety-laden language of how man-made global warming will be significantly detrimental to humanity. But the Times' politicking of the CSSR's plight is even worse.

Initially, Fox News points out, "The [NYT] story ... said the draft report 'has not yet been made public' but 'a copy of it was obtained by The New York Times.'" Only that erroneous claim didn't fly for very long. And it wasn't whistleblowers who exposed the Times' duplicity.

Rutgers professor Bob Kopp, who contributed to CSSR, tweeted, "It's not clear what the news is in this story; posted draft is public review draft from Dec, and WH review hasn't yet missed Aug 18 deadline" to officially endorse the CSSR. A few moments later he added, "The Times' leaked draft has been on the Internet Archive since January, during the public comment period." Kopp's colleague Katharine Hayhoe likewise tweeted, "Important to point out that this report was already accessible to anyone who cared to read it during public review & comment time. Few did."

Translation: Nothing was really leaked at all. The Times' story now contains this correction: "While it was not widely publicized, the report was uploaded by the nonprofit Internet Archive in January; it was not first made public by The New York Times." Oops. What the Times saw was a chance to exploit an obscure report to further its agenda of portraying Donald Trump as a Neanderthal who "could change or suppress the report" without the public's knowledge. It also attempted to paint ecofascists as good Samaritans who had no choice but to "leak" a report to save humanity. Instead, the public now has even more proof that the Times continues to lack journalistic integrity.
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 15040


« Reply #2115 on: Today at 07:13:15 PM »

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/16/now-theyre-comparing-antifa-to-american-vets/?utm_source=site-share

I recall being told that these are professional journalists.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 41 42 [43] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!