Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 27, 2016, 10:56:46 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
95565 Posts in 2314 Topics by 1081 Members
Latest Member: Martel
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Politics & Religion
| | |-+  The Hillbillary Clintons long, sordid, and often criminal history
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] Print
Author Topic: The Hillbillary Clintons long, sordid, and often criminal history  (Read 144802 times)
objectivist1
Power User
***
Posts: 958


« Reply #1150 on: June 05, 2016, 09:00:03 PM »

Hillary On The Ropes

By Andrew P. Napolitano - - Wednesday, June 1, 2016
ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Late last week, the inspector general of the State Department completed a yearlong investigation into the use by Hillary Clinton of a private email server for all of her official government email as secretary of state. The investigation was launched when information technology officials at the State Department under Secretary of State John Kerry learned that Mrs. Clinton paid an aide to migrate her public and secret State Department email streams away from their secured government venues and onto her own, non-secure server, which was stored in her home.

The migration of the secret email stream most likely constituted the crime of espionage — the failure to secure and preserve the secrecy of confidential, secret or top-secret materials.

The inspector general interviewed Mrs. Clinton’s three immediate predecessors — Madeleine Albright, Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice — and their former aides about their email practices. He learned that none of them used emails as extensively as Mrs. Clinton, none used a private server and, though Gen. Powell and Miss Rice occasionally replied to government emails using private accounts, none used a private account when dealing with state secrets.

Mrs. Clinton and her former aides declined to cooperate with the inspector general, notwithstanding her oft-stated claim that she “can’t wait” to meet with officials and clear the air about her emails.

The inspector general’s report is damning to Mrs. Clinton. It refutes every defense she has offered to the allegation that she mishandled state secrets. It revealed an email that hadn’t been publicly made known showing Mrs. Clinton’s state of mind. And it paints a picture of a self-isolated secretary of state stubbornly refusing to comply with federal law for venal reasons; she simply did not want to be held accountable for her official behavior.

The report rejects Mrs. Clinton’s argument that her use of a private server “was allowed.” The report makes clear that it was not allowed, nor did she seek permission to use it. She did not inform the FBI, which had tutored her on the lawful handling of state secrets, and she did not inform her own State Department information technology folks.

The report also makes clear that had she sought permission to use her own server as the instrument through which all of her email traffic passed, such a request would have been flatly denied.

In addition, the report rejects her argument — already debunked by the director of the FBI — that the FBI is merely conducting a security review of the State Department’s email storage and usage policies rather than a criminal investigation of her. The FBI does not conduct security reviews. The inspector general does. This report is the result of that review, and Mrs. Clinton flunked it, as it reveals that she refused to comply with the same State Department storage and transparency regulations she was enforcing against others.

Here is what is new publicly: When her private server was down and her BlackBerry immobilized for days at a time, she refused to use a government-issued BlackBerry because of her fear of the Freedom of Information Act. She preferred to go dark, or back to the 19th-century technology of having documents read aloud to her.

This report continues the cascade of legal misery that has befallen her in the past eight months. The State Department she once headed has rejected all of her arguments. Two federal judges have ordered her aides to testify about a conspiracy in her office to evade federal laws. She now awaits an interrogation by impatient FBI agents, which will take place soon after the New Jersey and California primaries next week. Her legal status can only be described as grave or worse than grave.

We know that Mrs. Clinton’s own camp finally recognizes just how dangerous this email controversy has become for her. Over the Memorial Day weekend, John Podesta, the chairman of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, sent an email to her most important donors. In it, he recognizes the need to arm the donors with talking points to address Mrs. Clinton’s rapidly deteriorating support with Democratic primary voters.

The Podesta email suggests attempting to minimize Mrs. Clinton’s use of her private server by comparing it to Gen. Powell’s occasional use of his personal email account. This is a risky and faulty comparison. None of Gen. Powell’s emails from his private account — only two or three dozen — contained matters that were confidential, secret or top-secret.

Mrs. Clinton diverted all of her email traffic to her private server — some 66,000 emails, about 2,200 of which contained state secrets. Moreover, Gen. Powell never used his own server, nor is he presently seeking to become the chief federal law enforcement officer in the land.

The inspector general who wrote the report was nominated by President Obama and confirmed by the Senate in 2013, after Mrs. Clinton left office. He did a commendable job — one so thorough and enlightening that it has highlighted the important role that inspectors general play in government today.

Today every department in the executive branch has, by law, an inspector general in place who has the authority to investigate the department — keeping officials’ feet to the fire by exposing failure to comply with federal law.

If you are curious as to why the inspector general of the State Department during Mrs. Clinton’s years as secretary did not discover all of Mrs. Clinton’s lawbreaking while she was doing it, the answer will alarm but probably not surprise you.

There was no inspector general at the State Department during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as secretary — a state of affairs unique in modern history; and she knew that. How much more knowledge of her manipulations will the Justice Department tolerate before enforcing the law?


• Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is a contributor to The Washington Times. He is the author of seven books on the U.S. Constitution.
Logged

"You have enemies?  Good.  That means that you have stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Winston Churchill.
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1151 on: June 06, 2016, 06:28:29 AM »

"There was no inspector general at the State Department during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure as secretary — a state of affairs unique in modern history; and she knew that. How much more knowledge of her manipulations will the Justice Department tolerate before enforcing the law?"

I brought this up in a previous post.  Well why is THIS FACT also not a crime of hers.  She, or someone at State was supposed to appoint an IG by Congressional statute.

From my post of May 31st:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_the_Inspector_General_of_the_Department_of_State

Being the smartest lawyer who ever lived she was confused about the rules?

Judge N is great.   I really enjoy his analyses .  He is brilliant ...
But he leaves out the fact that unless the controlling legal authority fails to act and soon she could be President and pardon herself.  All the time using Clinton Mafia money to pay the best legal defense lawyers on the planet.

Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1152 on: June 06, 2016, 09:21:47 AM »



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_the_Inspector_General_of_the_Department_of_State
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1153 on: June 06, 2016, 09:23:35 AM »

second post

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/05/hillary-clinton-private-email-endangered-life-physical-safety/
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1154 on: June 06, 2016, 09:52:10 AM »

What does "EDC" stand for?

 
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13703


« Reply #1155 on: June 08, 2016, 08:40:50 AM »

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-07/hillary-clinton-talks-about-inequality-jacket-cost-more-new-car

Woman of the people.
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8021


« Reply #1156 on: June 08, 2016, 10:11:49 AM »


1. She is the world's worst possible choice for spokesperson of that cause.  Total hypocrisy.

2. She is doing it only to pander to Bernie-type voters.  It's not something that bother's her.  Obviously she's comfortable hanging with the 1%, guarding their interests, being one of them.

3. The substance and content of that position needs to be called out and soundly defeated regardless.  For example, please see Larry Elder, On Inequality, http://dogbrothers.com/phpBB2/index.php?topic=1023.msg96504#msg96504
The idea that we can 'defeat' inequality is nonsense.

4. Recognize this for what it is, one of those magical domestic issues like poverty, racism, homelessness, that the worse they can make it, the more we need them to 'do more'.  This is right out of whatever leftist playbook you may follow, Alinsky, Ayers, Carville, Reich.

5.  The math and facts behind the issue are worse than for climate change.  Everything from Census Data that excludes the income of the poor to Thomas Piketty's flawed studies are manufactured for deception and thoroughly debunked IMHO on these pages in the forum.

6.  If we has total and complete economic equality, as much as it is possible, we would all be poor and power would still be concentrated in the hands of less than the 1%.  See Chavez, Maduro, Castro, Breznev, Kim Jong-un.
Logged
objectivist1
Power User
***
Posts: 958


« Reply #1157 on: June 08, 2016, 10:48:12 AM »

Hillary Clinton has a decades-long documented history of dishonesty and outright disregard for the law.  Let's not forget that she was kicked off the subcommittee investigating Watergate by a DEMOCRAT, who called her "extremely dishonest."  That the press has covered for her all these years is despicable.  Donald Trump is correct that she should not even be eligible to run for President considering her history.  What she has done makes what Richard Nixon did pale in comparison - and yet he was crucified in the press and in the court of public opinion for those relatively minor offenses.  How far we have sunk as a nation from a moral sense when 70% of Democrats believe that Hillary should continue to run EVEN IF SHE IS INDICTED. 

I personally find the oft-repeated refrain that Trump is equally as bad as Hillary both laughable and disgusting.  A Hillary presidency would consign this nation to a 4 or 8-year continuation of Barack Obama's policies, from which we would never recover in our lifetimes.  That the anti-Trumpers can't see this obvious fact and see the obvious and easy choice to be made between the two bodes very badly for the future of this country.
Logged

"You have enemies?  Good.  That means that you have stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Winston Churchill.
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1158 on: June 08, 2016, 02:11:53 PM »

EDC= Empress Dowager of Chappaqua
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1159 on: June 08, 2016, 03:30:21 PM »

"EDC= Empress Dowager of Chappaqua"

So you agree that EDC was by law supposed to appoint an inspector general but did not ?

So wh¥ is that not a clear violation of law in addition to all the others?
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1160 on: June 08, 2016, 03:39:28 PM »

"How far we have sunk as a nation from a moral sense when 70% of Democrats believe that Hillary should continue to run EVEN IF SHE IS INDICTED."

Half the country including myself agree with this.  Some portion of the other 50
%  (~ 1/3?) also agree but will vote for her because they will not vote Republican and the rest could care less because they are all in on her mafia organization.

In any case there is no controlling legal authority that will do anything about it at this time. Obama won't.  The AG won't.

I still guess there will be some sort of deal made to get her off.   Like with no admittance of wrong doing, just mistakes or at most carelessness, maybe be disbarred , take a national security class, fine, or whatever slap on the wrist General Patraeus got .  And he was finally let off in anticipation of letting her off easy.   It was the setup for her.

Yup, all just so sickening.   

Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8021


« Reply #1161 on: June 10, 2016, 07:32:49 AM »

EDC= Empress Dowager of Chappaqua

Dowager:  Power derived from her husband.

From Chappaqua, her hometown, lol.  She was in government housing so long she couldn't remember where she's from.  She didn't want to go back to Chicago or Little Rock and DC doesn't have Senators.
---------------------------------------

Trump hopes western PA is Trump country.  Meanwhile, Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin and his wife, Kiya, a fashion designer, will host a private fundraiser for Clinton at their home Tuesday afternoon. According to an invitation, attendees will donate $10,000 to $34,000 each to hear Clinton discuss her (indictments?) candidacy.
http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/10600024-74/pittsburgh-trump-rally

Sorry, I don't associate Steelers fans with Hillary supporters.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 07:51:28 AM by DougMacG » Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1162 on: June 10, 2016, 08:32:14 AM »

"Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin and his wife, Kiya, a fashion designer, will host a private fundraiser for Clinton at their home Tuesday afternoon."

Naturally the wife will be happy to donate a high end wardrobe that is oked by Hillary's marketing team for her to wear on the red carpet.

All her jackets look Maoist these days.

I am sure Hillary will in kind say that Pittsburg is her favorite team and she follows them during season.
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1163 on: June 10, 2016, 04:09:39 PM »

Obama is now endorsing Hill, Sanders out and Warren's name as well as a few other floated as VP possibilities to see public reaction. Whoever gets most reaction wins.  Hillary sits and smugly answers Bret Baeir's question that she is 100% sure the email thing will not be a problem.  "I would like to wrap this up and put this behind me" (or something like that she said recently)

 Exactly how the Democrats will get this wrapped up is the only question, not if.  Cal may be right.  It may simply be a pardon by Obama.  My guess is that he will not even he put in that position.
All of us here knew in our hearts this would happen.  But there was always (false) hope, like  a terminal cancer patient grasping on straws, that finally, finally someone who is a controlling legal authority would have enough courage and honesty to see that justice is served and this serial criminal gets punished.  

***Cal Thomas
By Cal Thomas
Published June 7, 2016
image: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/carics/hillary_extradition.jpg?ref=relatedBox
  
Some believe that soon after Tuesday's final presidential primaries the FBI will interview Hillary Clinton about her handling of emails while she was secretary of state. What comes next is the subject of much speculation.

One of the better speculators is Bradley Blakeman, who served as a member of President George W. Bush's White House staff.

We spoke in the "green room" at Fox News before our separate interviews. The following is culled from our conversation.

Blakeman says the FBI has deliberately waited to interview Hillary Clinton until after the primaries because the bureau did not want to interfere with the nominating process. He thinks the FBI is "likely" to recommend to the Department of Justice whether or not she should be indicted for violating what she says are agency rules and what others call the law between now and the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, which begins July 25.

If she is indicted before the convention, Blakeman says, it will give the party an opportunity to make changes in the rules that could result in an alternate nominee.

Here is the intriguing part about Blakeman's scenario: "If a grand jury is empaneled, or if she were to be indicted before the convention, the Democrats would have to let her go." If an indictment were to come after the convention, he says, it presents a different problem because each state needs to certify their ballots before November. If an indictment occurs after the states have certified their ballots, it would be nearly impossible to replace Hillary Clinton with another candidate.

Here's where things might get even more interesting. In states where ballots have been certified, the party would have to go to court to ask that Clinton's name be replaced. "They also have another problem," says Blakeman. "Once the convention ends, how do they reconvene to substitute Hillary? They have no rules for that."

What if a court denies a ballot change? Blakeman says the Supreme Court would almost certainly have to decide. That might look to many like a replay of the 2000 election in which the court certified Florida's vote count, awarding the state's electoral votes -- and the election -- to George W. Bush.

But what if the court -- with its one vacancy -- divides 4-4? In that case, the lower court ruling would prevail and if that court decided to strike Hillary Clinton's name from the ballot, a write-in would be the only option.


"Timing is not on Hillary's side," says Blakeman, who thinks "the silver lining for Hillary is that, if she were indicted, there is no doubt Obama would pardon her on January 19 as he walks out the door. She will never have to answer for her crimes."

What about any others who might be indicted, such as top aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills? If they are indicted, but not pardoned by the president, will they go public? It's the stuff of big book contracts.

Should any of these scenarios prove true, as Blakeman thinks they might, President Obama, unlike President Ford and his pardon of Richard Nixon, will never have to face the voters and be held accountable for his action.

In this unpredictable election season, any one -- or all -- of these scenarios are possibilities, including the ultimate scenario: the delegates turning to Vice President Joe Biden to save them from Hillary and defeat in November.***


« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 04:26:45 PM by ccp » Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13703


« Reply #1164 on: June 10, 2016, 04:17:26 PM »

In Hillary's defense, without her, Bill would probably be the top used car salesman in Little Rock. And/or a registered sex offender.


EDC= Empress Dowager of Chappaqua

Dowager:  Power derived from her husband.

From Chappaqua, her hometown, lol.  She was in government housing so long she couldn't remember where she's from.  She didn't want to go back to Chicago or Little Rock and DC doesn't have Senators.
---------------------------------------

Trump hopes western PA is Trump country.  Meanwhile, Pittsburgh Steelers coach Mike Tomlin and his wife, Kiya, a fashion designer, will host a private fundraiser for Clinton at their home Tuesday afternoon. According to an invitation, attendees will donate $10,000 to $34,000 each to hear Clinton discuss her (indictments?) candidacy.
http://triblive.com/news/allegheny/10600024-74/pittsburgh-trump-rally

Sorry, I don't associate Steelers fans with Hillary supporters.
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8021


« Reply #1165 on: June 11, 2016, 10:53:41 PM »

In Hillary's defense, without her, Bill would probably be the top used car salesman in Little Rock. And/or a registered sex offender.

True.  One helliva team.  Her political instincts have been wrong about almost everything.  Still the best the Dems have found since Bill and Barack. 

If she is the smartest woman in the world, that's no way to talk about the rest.
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 8021


« Reply #1166 on: June 12, 2016, 11:18:03 AM »

Fox News had Clinton surrogate Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) on, (auditioning for VP).

She turned all Hillary questions back to Trump as gracefully as she could.

Brett Baier asked her about the Hillary University dollars scandal.  She said, "well I don't know anything about that."

But she did.  They laid out all the facts on the screen, amounts of payments, timing of payments, etc.  16.5 million from the University to the Clintons.  55 million from the US taxpayer to the University, a good part of it from the State Department UNDER HER WATCH.
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/02/hillary-university-bill-clinton-bagged-16-46-million-from-for-profit-college-as-state-dept-funneled-55-million-back/

What she meant was, no one could have an answer for that except to say Donald Trump is worse.  But Donald Trump didn't do anything like THAT and he isn't under FBI inquiry.
Logged
G M
Power User
***
Posts: 13703


« Reply #1167 on: June 12, 2016, 08:10:51 PM »

http://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/crime/2016/06/12/who-omar-mateen/85791280/
A former Fort Pierce police officer who once worked with 29-year-old Omar Mateen, the assailant in an Orlando nightclub shooting that left at least 50 dead, said he was "unhinged and unstable."

Daniel Gilroy said he worked the 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. shift with G4S Security at the south gate at PGA Village for several months in 2014-15. Mateen took over from him for a 3 to 11 p.m. shift.

Gilroy, a former Fort Pierce police officer, said Mateen frequently made homophobic and racial comments. Gilroy said he complained to his employer several times but it did nothing because he was Muslim. Gilroy quit after he said Mateen began stalking him via multiple text messages — 20 or 30 a day. He also sent Gilroy 13 to 15 phone messages a day, he said.


FLORIDA TODAY
Orlando shooting is deadliest in U.S. history

"I quit because everything he said was toxic," Gilroy said Sunday, "and the company wouldn't do anything. This guy was unhinged and unstable. He talked of killing people."

Gilroy said this shooting didn't come as a surprise to him.



https://westernrifleshooters.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/tumblr_o8o7rlyxck1r7p8tto1_1280.jpg?w=500&h=334
« Last Edit: June 12, 2016, 08:20:50 PM by G M » Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1168 on: June 14, 2016, 01:58:30 AM »

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/06/obama-admin-promises-clinton-email-dump-on-a-day-that-doesnt-exist/

http://www.elderstatement.com/2016/06/julian-assange-wikileaks-plans-to.html

Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1169 on: June 17, 2016, 09:17:21 PM »

http://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/clinton-email-scandal-imminent-document-leak-enough-to-indict-her/
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1170 on: June 19, 2016, 11:32:46 AM »

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/14/judge-confirms-criminal-probe-clinton-emails/?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWVRGa1pUQmhNamt6WW1JMyIsInQiOiJINENla2V1ZnpSanBic2J2TWNES3JHSU4wRGU0VFNUWEdUczRwTDZkRDVQQ3dNN3c3YXozR0lITnFFRFRjVDNiY3JaaFhzZFFGdTRxYWRSOHExeGRkTUpTMktudm16WCtCdERKYnFWZ3RpVT0ifQ%3D%3D
Logged
objectivist1
Power User
***
Posts: 958


« Reply #1171 on: June 21, 2016, 02:52:58 PM »

DNC Researched Clinton Speeches, Travel Records

Hacked documents are latest leaked by "Guccifer 2.0"



JUNE 21--The latest document dump from “Guccifer 2.0,” the hacker who breached the Democratic National Committee’s servers, shows that party officials have researched Hillary Clinton’s prior travel on private jets, the Clinton Foundation’s investments, and the Democratic presidential candidate’s speech contracts.

The hacker this morning began distributing more than 250 files--totaling thousands of pages of records--that appear to have been prepared by DNC research staff.

In e-mails to TSG, “Guccifer 2.0” claimed to be from Romania (like “Guccifer”) and portrayed himself as a “hacktivist” with “a lot of fans” and an “unknown hacker with a laptop.” He also chafed at TSG’s prior description of him as a felon. “Ok, but stop calling me the vandal. I'm not a criminal I'm a freedom fighter,” the hacker wrote.

As for the DNC’s claim that the breach was the work of Russian intelligence agents, “Guccifer 2.0” dismissed the assertion as a “Total fail!!!” In recent correspondence, the hacker has used an AOL France e-mail account.

The bulk of the material released today centers on Clinton’s position on scores of domestic and international issues and criticisms leveled against her by assorted opponents. The documents include Clinton’s counterarguments to those attacks from Republican officials and other foes.

Along with Clinton’s tax returns, personal financial disclosure reports, and U.S. Senate travel records, the DNC dossier included copies of contract documents related to the presidential candidate’s paid speeches.

In addition to a “standard” $225,000 fee, Clinton required a “chartered roundtrip private jet” that needed to be a Gulfstream 450 or a larger aircraft. Depending on its outfitting, the Gulfstream jet, which costs upwards of $40 million, can seat 19 passengers and “sleeps up to six.” Clinton’s contract also stipulated that speech hosts had to pay for separate first class or business airfare for three of her aides.

As for lodging, Clinton required “a presidential suite” and up to “three (3) adjoining or contiguous rooms for her travel aides” and up to two extra rooms for advance staff. The host was also responsible for the Clinton travel party’s ground transportation, meals, and “phone charges/cell phones.”

Additionally, the host also had to pay “a flat fee of $1000” for a stenographer to create “an immediate transcript of Secretary Clinton’s remarks.” The contract adds, however, “We will be unable to share a copy of the transcript following the event.” (3 pages)
Logged

"You have enemies?  Good.  That means that you have stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Winston Churchill.
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1172 on: June 22, 2016, 03:53:54 PM »

Is this the purse she carries her *Bible* and *hot sauce* in:

https://www.yahoo.com/style/hillary-clintons-3500-purse-overshadows-birth-142002877.html
Logged
objectivist1
Power User
***
Posts: 958


« Reply #1173 on: June 23, 2016, 11:10:29 AM »

Liar, Liar Pantsuit On Fire

And with Donald Trump's renewed focus, is the comeuppance of economically illiterate "Crooked Hillary" at hand?


June 23, 2016
Matthew Vadum


Hillary Clinton's bizarre claim that billionaire businessman Donald Trump will cause a recession if elected to the presidency was overshadowed yesterday as Trump took deadly aim at the pathological liar's horrifying public service track record.

For her part, Clinton glibly dismissed Trump.

"As I said yesterday in Ohio, Donald Trump offers no real solutions for the economic challenges we face," Clinton said in a speech to the faithful in Raleigh, N.C. "He just continues to spout reckless ideas that will run up our debt and cause another economic crash."

Around the same time, Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, laid into "Crooked Hillary" with a vigor and focus that Americans haven't seen for a while. Trump's speech, in which he accurately described Clinton as a "world-class liar," was very well received and is making left-wing pundits nervous -- for good reason.

Unlike Trump's address, Clinton's speech was a carefully constructed alternate reality held together by a tissue of leftist lies. Clinton's oration was an economically illiterate catalog of hoary Marxist cliches, or as Dr. Bob Shillman quipped, "liar, liar, pantsuit on fire."

Clinton offered a vague outline of her disastrous socialistic economic agenda, largely a continuation of President Obama's anti-growth policies and tainted as it is by a focus on so-called social justice objectives at the expense of economic growth and individual rights.

She spoke nonsensically of "growth that’s strong, fair, and lasting ... that reduces inequality, increases upward mobility, that reaches into every corner of our country." To keep her union thugs happy, Clinton vowed to "say no to bad trade deals and unfair trade practices, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership," and no to the "assault on the right to organize and bargain collectively."

Ignoring the fact that she served front and center in a radically left-wing administration that over the last nearly seven and a half years has presided over the weakest economic recovery since the Great Depression, Clinton promised "to make this economy work for everybody ... building it from the ground up, from every home and every community, all the way to Washington."

Leftists like Hillary enjoy anthropomorphizing inanimate objects and abstract concepts because they can't win policy arguments on the merits. They prefer fabricating monsters they can slay.

Guns and gas-guzzling SUVs "kill" people, they routinely claim as if machines were sentient, volitional beings. To them the U.S. Constitution is a "living document" that changes with the times. And like their cousins the Keynesians, they treat the economy like a circus animal that can be manipulated and taught tricks, instead of as the product of billions of individual decisions made every day by producers and consumers.

Clinton dredged up one of the Left's favorite and most insidious talking points, declaring "it is way past time for us to guarantee equal pay for women."

The fanciful claim that women earn less than men will probably never die because it is essential to the Left's narrative that America is inherently unfair. Of course comparing men's wages to women's wages is like comparing apples to oranges. Women pull in less money because they tend to opt for more humanities and fewer science and math majors in college. Owing to family and child-rearing obligations, women as a group also tend not to work the long hours that men work.

Critiquing President Obama's claim that women earn just 77 cents for every dollar men earn, the Manhattan Institute's Diana Furchtgott-Roth wrote in 2013 that the 77-cent figure "is bogus because it averages all full-time women, no matter what education and profession, with all full-time men."

"Unmarried childless women's salaries, however, often exceed men's," she wrote. "In a comparison of unmarried and childless men and women between the ages of 35 and 43, women earn more: 108 cents on a man's dollar."

The feminist fabulist continued spinning yarns.

"Excessive inequalities such as we have today reduces economic growth," Clinton said, pretending she likes the market economy. "Markets work best when all the stakeholders share in the benefits," she said, paying homage to candidate Obama's mantra that "when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody."

"There are great ideas out there," Clinton said. "And we are going to be partners in a big, bold effort to increase economic growth and distribute it more fairly, to build that economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top." The "Wall Street corporations and the super rich," also known as her most ardent supporters, must be made to "pay their fair share of taxes."

She promised to "make college debt-free for all" and to "rewrite the rules so more companies share profits with their employers and few ship profits and jobs overseas."

Clinton defended the international cash-for-future-presidential-favors trading platform known as the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. She belittled Trump for highlighting the corruption endemic to the enterprise that is primarily devoted to enriching the Clinton family.

Trump is trying "to distract us" by "attacking a philanthropic foundation that saves and improves lives around the world," she said with a straight face. "It's no surprise he doesn't understand these things."

The Heritage Foundation's Stephen Moore dismantled what he called Clinton's "Twilight Zone" grab bag of proposals. A related speech Hillary gave the previous day "was vacant of ANY ideas at all about how to help the economy. The left's idea cupboard is entirely empty. "

Moore mocked her claim that here "in America we pay our bills," a reference to what he called "Trump's sensible idea of refinancing out debt to lock in historically low interest rates." The Obama administration in which Clinton served has generated some $8 trillion of new debt, which is hardly "paying the bills."

"It's passing them on to the next generation," Moore wrote.

Clinton's claim that Trump doesn't understand the new economy and job creation, is "a bold claim since Donald Trump is a highly successful businessman who actually has created thousands of jobs, while Hillary has gotten rich off of... politics."

Moore continued:

    "The class warfare theme ran throughout the speech, and yet this presents Hillary with another uncomfortable problem. Obama has raised the minimum wage, he already did spent $830 billion on infrastructure stimulus spending, and he has taxed the bejesus out of the rich. And the result wasn't more equality and a resurgent middle class, but an angry and worried worker class that hasn't seen a pay raise in 15 years and with household incomes in the last seven years that have fallen behind inflation. Some 95 million Americans aren't working and the poverty rate is still hellishly high."

Clinton "is selling the American voters sand in the desert: four more years of stay the course economic bromides at a time when two out of three voters say that the U.S. is on the wrong, not the right track."

Trump fired back at Hillary yesterday, hitting her hard enough that Clinton worshippers are getting anxious.

Slate's Michelle Goldberg lamented that the tide may be turning against the Benghazi bungler Trump paints as a corrupt, money-grubbing, political hack. Crestfallen, the diehard leftist called Trump's Wednesday speech on Clinton's record dishonest and demagogic but "terrifyingly effective" and "probably the most unnervingly effective" speech the man has ever given.

"In a momentary display of discipline, he read from a teleprompter with virtually no ad-libbing, avoiding digs at Bill Clinton’s infidelity or conspiracy theories about Vince Foster’s suicide," speaking "for 40 minutes without saying anything overtly sexist." Instead, he took aim at "Clinton’s most-serious weaknesses, describing her as a venal tool of the establishment."

“Hillary Clinton gave China millions of our best jobs and effectively let China completely rebuild itself,” Trump said. “In return, Hillary Clinton got rich!” He added, “She gets rich making you poor,” and declared her possibly “the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency.”

Goldberg treated Trump's address as brilliant performance art in which he "interwove truth and falsehood into a plausible-seeming picture meant to reinforce listeners' underlying beliefs."

Pretending her readers were complete idiots ignorant of Hillary's history, Goldberg wheeled out Washington establishment yes man David Gergen to denounce what he called Trump's "slanderous speech." On CNN an animated Gergen made a fool of himself by castigating Trump for relying on the exhaustively documented allegations of graft and corruption in Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by acclaimed best-selling author Peter Schweizer.

Regurgitating the self-serving nonsense peddled by leftist slander shop Media Matters for America, the "conservative misinformation" monitor that Hillary herself takes credit for founding, Gergen said that the "book has been basically discredited."

Not so. In fact, the New York Times, New Yorker, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Politico, Bloomberg, Reuters, ABC News, and CBS News have all confirmed several key details in Clinton Cash, investigative reporter Matthew Boyle points out.

Gergen added, "I'm sorry, at this level, you can't slander somebody."

Why Gergen has attained such prominence at this level in the Washington punditocracy is unclear.

What is clear is that he seems to know nothing about the Clinton family and has been asleep throughout Barack Obama's Saul Alinsky-inspired presidency.
Logged

"You have enemies?  Good.  That means that you have stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Winston Churchill.
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1174 on: June 23, 2016, 02:12:39 PM »

"The fanciful claim that women earn less than men will probably never die because it is essential to the Left's narrative that America is inherently unfair. Of course comparing men's wages to women's wages is like comparing apples to oranges. Women pull in less money because they tend to opt for more humanities and fewer science and math majors in college. Owing to family and child-rearing obligations, women as a group also tend not to work the long hours that men work."

I can tell you that is absolutely true in the health field.

Do private and public health insurances pay less for doctors who have female genitalia?
Do hospitals pay female nurses less then male nurses because of sex?

Another fraud claim.
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1175 on: June 24, 2016, 06:39:57 AM »

This could go under "humor WTF" thread .  Look specifically at the third picture down.  All I can think of is "2,000" later:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/see-first-photos-chelsea-clintons-150000538.html
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1176 on: June 24, 2016, 10:48:26 PM »

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/new-clinton-email-smoking-guns/?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=June+Weekly+Update
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1177 on: June 25, 2016, 01:42:51 PM »

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/clinton-failed-hand-key-email-state-department-40097531
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1178 on: June 26, 2016, 09:45:01 AM »

Paulson a lib and a globalist and donator to Clinton and ex Goldman Sachs.  Trump is NOT advocating we  " wall ourselves off from 7 billion people"! 

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/25/hank-paulson-cites-hillarys-globalist-platform-reason-endorsement/
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 5617


« Reply #1179 on: June 26, 2016, 10:19:20 AM »

Add this freak "accident" to the list of those around Clinton who just happen to die in the nick of time:

http://pagesix.com/2016/06/26/disgraced-ex-un-officials-death-conveniently-timed/
« Last Edit: June 26, 2016, 11:40:33 AM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1180 on: Today at 08:26:42 AM »


http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/254202/revived-questions-about-huma-abedin-matthew-vadum

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263183/huma-abedin-daughter-jihad-matthew-vadum

http://pamelageller.com/2016/06/saudis-kept-two-jihad-terror-groups-tied-to-huma-abedin-off-u-s-list.html/

« Last Edit: Today at 08:40:02 AM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 37055


« Reply #1181 on: Today at 12:29:01 PM »

http://conservativetribune.com/clinton-murder-case-cover-up/

http://conservativetribune.com/official-testify-against-hillary/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_medium=THENewVoice&utm_content=06/27/2016&utm_campaign=manualpost

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
« Last Edit: Today at 12:43:48 PM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!