Dog Brothers Public Forum

HOME | PUBLIC FORUM | MEMBERS FORUM | INSTRUCTORS FORUM | TRIBE FORUM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 24, 2017, 03:57:33 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Welcome to the Dog Brothers Public Forum.
104297 Posts in 2390 Topics by 1091 Members
Latest Member: Phorize
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  Dog Brothers Public Forum
|-+  Politics, Religion, Science, Culture and Humanities
| |-+  Politics & Religion
| | |-+  We the Well-armed People (gun and knife rights stuff )
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] Print
Author Topic: We the Well-armed People (gun and knife rights stuff )  (Read 501469 times)
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1750 on: February 24, 2017, 09:21:45 PM »

 DESIGNATION OF MILITIA RIFLES

By the authority vested in me as President and Commander in Chief of the Militia by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure the ability of citizens of the United States to defend themselves, their communities and their States, as well as to ensure the safety and security of our Nation, I hereby order as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. Both individual and community safety are critically important to the national security of the United States. Terrorism, transnational criminal activity and potential acts of war by foreign nations present a significant threat to national security and our citizens, who have the right and the duty to defend themselves, their communities, their States and the Nation.

Section 2. Policy. It is the policy of the executive branch to:

(a) Support and defend the Constitution, including the Second Amendment right of citizens to keep and bear arms for Militia purposes,as well asself-defense.

(b) Encourage citizens to be prepared to act as members of the Militia to defend communities, States and the Nation, as part of the common defense contemplated by the Constitution of the United States.

(c) Discourage restrictions by States and political subdivisionson individual possession of firearms suitable for Militia purposes by citizens of the United States.

Section 3. Definitions.

(a) “Militia” has the meaning given the term in Title 10, Section 311 of the United States Code to include the Unorganized Militia, as well as the meaning given to the term “Militia” under equivalent State statutes.

(b) “Self-Defense” shall mean the actions of citizens to defend themselves and their families from physical attack.

(c) “Communities” shall mean neighborhoods, towns, cities, counties and other political subdivisions of citizens who live in distinct geographic areas within a State.

(d) “State” shall mean one of the fifty States of the United States.

(e) “Militia Purposes” shall mean training, practice and preparedness which could improve the ability of a citizen to act,and to be armed in case of a need to act, as a member of a local, State or National organization commanded by government officials and responsive to a physical threat. Appropriate organizations include those commanded by an elected county or city Sheriff;those commanded by the Governor of a State through officers of that State’s Defense Force as authorized by Title 30, Section 109 of the United States Code, or through officers of that State’s National Guard;and organizations commanded by the President through officers of the Active or Reserve components of U.S. Armed Forces.

(f) “Militia Rifles” shall mean the firearms designated in Section 4 that are made in America and suitable for use in self-defense, community defense, defense of States and defense of the Nation.

Section 4. Designation of Militia Rifles. That the following firearms and accessories are authorized and appropriate for individual citizens to keep and bear for Militia purposes under the Constitution and the laws of the United States:

(a) The AR-15 and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, magazines of up to thirty round capacities, M-7 bayonets, and ammunition in 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington, in all quantities.

(b) The M1A and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs,magazines of up to twenty round capacities, M-6 bayonets, and ammunition in 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester, in all quantities.

(c) The M1 Garand and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flash suppressors and bayonet lugs, M-5 bayonets, and ammunition in.30-’06 Springfield, in all quantities.

(d) Bolt action rifles in the calibers of .30-’06 Springfield; 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester; 5.56 NATO or .223 Remington; or any substantially equivalent caliber, and ammunition appropriate for the rifles, in any quantity.

(This list could easily be expanded.)

Section 5. Pre-emption. This Executive Order is intended to pre-empt the laws of States or political subdivisions that infringe upon the rights of citizens to keep and bear the arms designated in Section 4.

Section 6. Judicial Notice. That the judges of all State and Federal Courts are hereby given notice that possession of the designated Militia Rifles and accessories by citizens should not be restricted or infringed upon by State laws or the laws of a political subdivision of a State and any such law should be reviewed under the strict scrutiny standard to determine whether it is a violation of the Constitution of the United States after judicial consideration of this Order and the fact that it was issued by the Commander in Chief of the Militia.

Donald J. Trump

THE WHITE HOUSE

March __, 2017

PROPOSED EXECUTIVE ORDER DESIGNATES MILITIA RIFLES FOR CITIZEN OWNERSHIP
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1751 on: February 27, 2017, 09:06:31 AM »

http://us5.campaign-archive2.com/?u=10f1b2be1fbee7acd9ac7bb79&id=f0a795bb19&e=0332f322fa
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1752 on: March 11, 2017, 10:04:04 AM »

3/7/17:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2017/03/obama-doj-failed-stop-mexican-cartel-murder-ice-agent-smuggled-guns/


10/23/14
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-key-fast-furious-information/
Logged
ccp
Power User
***
Posts: 7341


« Reply #1753 on: March 30, 2017, 07:13:46 AM »

My take.  Let this be a lesson to would be burglars:

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/alleged-getaway-driver-instructed-slain-teen-burglary-suspects-185005591--abc-news-topstories.html
« Last Edit: March 30, 2017, 12:36:54 PM by Crafty_Dog » Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1754 on: April 20, 2017, 08:26:08 AM »

https://patriotpost.us/alexander/48626

I make an annual donation to this group.
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1755 on: April 21, 2017, 12:22:40 AM »

https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/costs-consequences-gun-control#full
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1756 on: June 16, 2017, 07:29:04 PM »

http://www.thedailyliberator.com/facts-neither-side-wants-admit-gun-contro/#rJBkvchs2mX8u3RZ.99
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1757 on: July 11, 2017, 08:48:27 AM »



http://news.stanford.edu/2017/06/21/violent-crime-increases-right-carry-states/
Logged
DougMacG
Power User
***
Posts: 9006


« Reply #1758 on: July 11, 2017, 11:03:21 AM »


If John Lott is right, it is hard to believe a study out of respected institution can be so narrow and biased.  Lott also has a bias; his name is synonymous with more guns less crime.  But his data and studies are wider in scope.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/07/10/stanford-law-prof-gets-it-wrong-on-guns-right-to-carry-reduces-crime-not-other-way-around.html    John Lott:
"Would you rely almost exclusively on trends in Hawaii to predict violent crime rates in Idaho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, and Utah?  Would you look at Illinois to predict changes in Louisiana and South Carolina?   Illinois has a drastically difference crime landscape, with half of its violent crime occurring in Chicago.

Though it wouldn’t pass the laugh test for most people, an unpublished report making just these sorts of comparisons has been all the rage in the media.  Lead author John Donohue, a professor at Stanford Law School, makes a claim which goes against existing national research: that right-to-carry laws increase violent crime."
---------------------------

On a related matter, the congressional shooter could have and would have been stopped sooner if not for DC prohibit carry laws.
https://www.ammoland.com/2017/07/congressional-staffer-could-have-stopped-baseball-field-attack/#axzz4mXVEWVlg
"Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2017/07/congressional-staffer-could-have-stopped-baseball-field-attack/#ixzz4mXW7eA1X
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook

Rep. Loudermilk said. “If this had happened in Georgia, he wouldn't have gotten too far. I had a staff member who was in his car, maybe 20 yards behind the shooter. Back in Georgia [he] carries a nine millimeter in his car. I carry a weapon. He had a clear shot at him. But here, we're not allowed to carry any weapons here."
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1759 on: July 24, 2017, 08:42:17 AM »

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/449754/concealed-carry-permits-increasing-good-america
Logged
Crafty_Dog
Administrator
Power User
*****
Posts: 40839


« Reply #1760 on: July 27, 2017, 03:45:35 PM »

http://www.recoilweb.com/california-magazine-ban-stopped-in-its-tracks-128765.html?wc_mid=4035:7935&wc_rid=4035:28484361&_wcsid=3310334D3D21814928E35DA2B24DB22F354971D4291FADA0
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 34 35 [36] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!