18
« on: January 25, 2008, 08:54:43 PM »
A friend of mine (a young wife and mother who does not practice martial arts) wrote the following about her impression of the show. I thought it worth sharing:
I thought they portrayed the Dog Brothers very and only positively.
First, I give them kudos for featuring a topic/culture that few people outside of this group probably know about (until now, anyway).
I would loosely typify this group as something between a quasi martial arts alternative and a "no holds barred" therapy session. As I think about it -- it's very hard to define this group b/c it is many different things to its participants. For some, edgy exercise. For some, rituals. For some, self-accomplishment. "Dog Fighters" is a slight misnomer. It's the invitation, not the party.
It was good that the editors focused in early on the honor code during fights, as if to influence the viewer in a direction of thinking "these are not your father's rough-edged barfighing misfits".
The entire group structure & culture seems VERY well honed & thought out. I got the sense that the friendships & culture in this group runs very, very deep. Almost as if men come to this group to exorcise a very large life demon that only their fighter brethren can help them achieve.
I finished the show with a true sense of what this group is about: a cross-cut of men who chose a very alternative but noble competition. Modern day, sanitized gladiators.
There also will be a part of society that sees this just for what it is: a refined, millienium-esque fighting group -- nothing more, nothing less.
I really appreciated that they portrayed "thinking" men, professional men, emerging men, developed men & vulnerable men. The "everyman". There was no hint at cro-magnon or dumb street fighter, although some of the guys dabbled with a need for something "more" in an age of rule-heavy, clean sports. The balance of participants was enlightening - both in age & life experience.
Of course, leave it to a science channel to insert needless psycho babble!
Why DO producers feel the need to qualify EVERYTHING with humanists itching to equate this to....I don't even know WHAT they were trying to equate it to b/c their "specialists" were really grabbing at dead air the entire show. They sounded so unsure of what they were trying to define. I kept thinking, "SHUT UP & get back to the show."
Finally, I suspect interest in this group will skyrocket & that National Geo will do a follow-on to this piece in the next year or 2. I could see a WHOLE season or series on this. Very timely.
As you can see, I was very intrigued by the show (I'm re-viewing it on Sat. night & insisting Erik watch it, too). But, beyond that...it was really good to see you grabbing life, firmly.
Stay safe, warrior.
Shelly