It should go without saying that fighting with protection is
different than fighting without protection. Please notice I said "different", and didn't place a value judgment on it. They each have their utility.
Here's my short answer: in my experience, whatever area I have protected, then I'm not as worried about that area as if it weren't protected. Consequently, my priorities are different, and I fight differently. Also, I can get more training time in with protection; likewise, I can get more realistic training without protection. Again, both have their place.
Allow me to offer up 2 examples:
(1) When grappling: sometimes I wear a cup, mouthpiece, and headgear. When I remove this protection, it changes my game. It's not a complete change, but I do make some subtle changes. I do my straight armbars differently so as not to crush my testicles with the guy's arm. When I don't wear a mouthpiece, I have to defend a crossface sooner. And without headgear, my ears get folded over and might swell up -- until I remember how to protect them again.
So when I train for a competition that will allow such protection, I will wear it. I might as well, since it protects me, and consequently is an advantage. For competition, I want to have all the advantages. However, for realism, I usually remove that protection since I'll probably never have on the street (unless leaving jiu-jitsu, for instance
). In the real world, I want the advantage of having trained as realistically as possible for that encounter.
(2) When stickfighting: sometimes I spar with gear, sometimes I use padded sticks, and I have fought without hand or head protection. Padded sticks are fun, and can be a good training tool as long as when I'm training, I am "honest" with myself about when I'm getting hit or if I can take certain kinds of shots. Likewise, training with protection has its place. I can train more, which is important, and yes, it's extremely realistic, just as the UFC is realistic. However, the UFC is a contest with limits and 2 oz gloves, and in the real world, I want to be prepared for when there are no limits. Punches might play less of a role without gloves.
Nevertheless, it's not quite the same as fighting without protection, which was intense, and brought me to a new level. It changed my life. And that's what I'm looking for out of my training -- expanding my horizons, pushing my limits, making me achieve and do things I never thought possible. I have found that the mind limits the body more than the body limits the body.
Of course, the risk of fighting without protection is higher. When I stick fought without armor, I got thrust in the cheek, and immediately realized I needed to protect my face better. So I grabbed the stick. If I had a mask on, my priorities might have been different. It might hurt, but the self-preservation instinct of protecting my face kicked in. I also knew I didn't want to take any hand shots, which I could probably survive with gloves.
Let me add this: I love NHB/MMA and stickfighting. I think this kind of fighting really develops people, helps them grow, which I believe is one of the DBMA goals. So, if fighting without hand and head protection helps you grow, that's great. If you're not interested, that's cool too. We're all hopefully just training to grow, get better, learn, and be part of a great brotherhood.
So, I hope you find this helpful. I'm sure other people can comment on this as well. I have the utmost respect for the Dog Brothers, which is why I joined this forum: to expand my horizons, and discuss FMA and stickfighting with people I have something in common with. After all, there aren't too many people in our society fighting each other with sticks!
Gumagalang,
-Sean Brandt